Literature DB >> 15245675

Application of haptic feedback to robotic surgery.

Brian T Bethea1, Allison M Okamura, Masaya Kitagawa, Torin P Fitton, Stephen M Cattaneo, Vincent L Gott, William A Baumgartner, David D Yuh.   

Abstract

Robotic surgical systems have greatly contributed to the advancement of minimally invasive endoscopic surgery. However, current robotic systems do not provide tactile or haptic feedback to the operating surgeon. Under certain circumstances, particularly with the manipulation of delicate tissues and suture materials, this may prove to be a significant irritation. We hypothesize that haptic feedback, in the form of sensory substitution, facilitates the performance of surgical knot tying. This preliminary study describes evidence that visual sensory substitution permits the surgeon to apply more consistent, precise, and greater tensions to fine suture materials without breakage during robot-assisted knot tying.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15245675      PMCID: PMC1283126          DOI: 10.1089/1092642041255441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  9 in total

1.  Robotic mitral valve repair: trapezoidal resection and prosthetic annuloplasty with the da vinci surgical system.

Authors:  W R Chitwood; L W Nifong; J E Elbeery; W H Chapman; R Albrecht; V Kim; J A Young
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Closed-chest coronary artery surgery on the beating heart with the use of a robotic system.

Authors:  U Kappert; R Cichon; J Schneider; V Gulielmos; S M Tugtekin; K Matschke; I Schramm; S Schueler
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Virtual environments for training critical skills in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  M Downes; M C Cavusoglu; W Gantert; L W Way; F Tendick
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1998

4.  The future of robotic cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Hamdy Awad; Randall K Wolf; Glenn P Gravlee
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 5.  Robotic cardiac surgery: present and future applications.

Authors:  Gabor Czibik; Giuseppe D'Ancona; Harry W Donias; Hratch L Karamanoukian
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Training and assessment of laparoscopic skills using a haptic simulator.

Authors:  Göran Rolfsson; Anna Nordgren; Stefan Bindzau; J-P Hagström; John McLaughlin; Lennart Thurfjell
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2002

7.  Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients.

Authors:  F W Mohr; V Falk; A Diegeler; T Walther; J F Gummert; J Bucerius; S Jacobs; R Autschbach
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Computer-assisted telemanipulation: an enabling technology for endoscopic coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  H Shennib; A Bastawisy; M J Mack; F H Moll
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Robotic cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Tammy Beth Reger; Mary Ellen Janhke
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 0.676

  9 in total
  29 in total

1.  Real-time three-dimensional soft tissue reconstruction for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jędrzej Kowalczuk; Avishai Meyer; Jay Carlson; Eric T Psota; Shelby Buettner; Lance C Pérez; Shane M Farritor; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Review of fluorescence guided surgery visualization and overlay techniques.

Authors:  Jonathan T Elliott; Alisha V Dsouza; Scott C Davis; Jonathan D Olson; Keith D Paulsen; David W Roberts; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 3.  Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education.

Authors:  Bishoy Morris
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-09-27

4.  Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents.

Authors:  P Ström; L Hedman; L Särnå; A Kjellin; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  A M Okamura
Journal:  Ind Rob       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Visual-perceptual mismatch in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Ahmad Abiri; Anna Tao; Meg LaRocca; Xingmin Guan; Syed J Askari; James W Bisley; Erik P Dutson; Warren S Grundfest
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The role of tactile feedback in grip force during laparoscopic training tasks.

Authors:  Christopher R Wottawa; Jeremiah R Cohen; Richard E Fan; James W Bisley; Martin O Culjat; Warren S Grundfest; Erik P Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  In vivo validation of a system for haptic feedback of tool vibrations in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Karlin Bark; William McMahan; Austin Remington; Jamie Gewirtz; Alexei Wedmid; David I Lee; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Auditory force feedback substitution improves surgical precision during simulated ophthalmic surgery.

Authors:  Nathan Cutler; Marcin Balicki; Mark Finkelstein; Jiangxia Wang; Peter Gehlbach; John McGready; Iulian Iordachita; Russell Taylor; James T Handa
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 10.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.

Authors:  O A J van der Meijden; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.