Literature DB >> 16822918

Digital radiography. A comparison with modern conventional imaging.

G J Bansal1.   

Abstract

The development of computed radiography over the past two decades has transformed radiological imaging. The radiology departments in the 21st century will look very different from those in the preceding period. In this review, the development of digital radiography is presented with a description of its various forms and a comparison with screen film radiography.

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16822918      PMCID： PMC2563775          DOI： 10.1136/pgmj.2005.038448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN： 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  13 in total

1.  Taking digital imaging to the next level: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  W Cecyl Hobbs
Journal:  Radiol Manage       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

Review 2.  Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging: state of the art.

Authors:  M D Murphey; J L Quale; N L Martin; J M Bramble; L T Cook; S J Dwyer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Imaging system architectures for picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  S J Dwyer
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Screen-film versus computed radiography imaging of the hand: a direct comparison.

Authors:  R G Swee; J E Gray; J W Beabout; R A McLeod; K L Cooper; J R Bond; D E Wenger
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Comparison of digital and conventional musculoskeletal radiography: an observer performance study.

Authors:  S A Wegryn; D W Piraino; B J Richmond; M D Schluchter; M Uetani; H A Freed; M A Meziane; G A Belhobek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Direct radiographic magnification with computed radiography.

Authors:  Y Nakano; T Hiraoka; K Togashi; K Nishimura; K Itoh; I Fujisawa; T Sagoh; S Minami; H Itoh; K Torizuka
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Computed radiography utilizing scanning laser stimulated luminescence.

Authors:  M Sonoda; M Takano; J Miyahara; H Kato
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography of the hands and feet: a subjective comparison.

Authors:  D W Piraino; W J Davros; M Lieber; B J Richmond; J P Schils; M P Recht; P N Grooff; G H Belhobek
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Nondisplaced fractures: spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imaging.

Authors:  M D Murphey; J M Bramble; L T Cook; N L Martin; S J Dwyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Clinical evaluation of a medical image management system for chest images.

Authors:  R L Arenson; S B Seshadri; H L Kundel; D DeSimone; F Van der Voorde; W B Gefter; D M Epstein; W T Miller; J M Aronchick; M B Simson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.959
View more
  18 in total

1.  Influence of the intergonial distance on image distortion in panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  D B S Ladeira; A D Cruz; S M Almeida; F N Bóscolo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Evaluation of lower limb axial alignment using digital radiography stitched films in pre-operative planning for total knee replacement.

Authors:  Michael J Neil; Jereme B Atupan; Juan Paulo L Panti; Robert A J Massera; Stewart Howard
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-06-29

3.  Qualitative Evaluation of Digital Hand X-rays Is Not a Reliable Method to Assess Bone Mineral Density.

Authors:  Andrew J Miller; Christopher Jones; Frederick Liss; Jack Abboudi; William Kirkpatrick; Pedro Beredjiklian
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-01

4.  Inter-Patient Modelling of 2D Lung Variations from Chest X-Ray Imaging via Fourier Descriptors.

Authors:  Ali Afzali; Farshid Babapour Mofrad; Majid Pouladian
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Transition to computed radiography: can emergency medicine doctors accurately predict the need of film printing to facilitate optimal patient care?

Authors:  Siu Ming Yang; Chor Man Lo
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2011

6.  Observer reliability between juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in measurement of stable Cobb's angle.

Authors:  Hitesh N Modi; Ting Chen; Seung Woo Suh; Satyen Mehta; S Srinivasalu; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Hae-Ryong Song
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Chimera of digital radiography in spine surgery: False diagnosis of implant failure.

Authors:  Khaled Hamed Salem; Andreas Ladenburger; Felix Schoth; Jörg Axel Ohnsorge
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-09-21

8.  The transition to digital presentation of the diagnostic imaging domain of the Part IV examination of the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners.

Authors:  Igor Himelfarb; Margaret A Seron; John K Hyland; Andrew R Gow; Nai-En Tang; Meghan Dukes; Margaret Smith; Michele Fisher
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2020-01-08

9.  Comparison of the Estimated Radiographic Remaining Dentine Thickness with the Actual Thickness Below the Deep Carious Lesions on the Posterior Teeth: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Nouf Al Jhany; Banin Al Hawaj; Alanoud Al Hassan; Zhoor Al Semrani; Mohammed Al Bulowey; Shahzeb Ansari
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2019-11-26

Review 10.  The Use of Intraoperative Digital Radiography Alignment Software to Assess Implant Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jacob P Siebenmorgen; Benjamin M Stronach; Simon C Mears; Jeffrey B Stambough
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.