Literature DB >> 22282504

Influence of the intergonial distance on image distortion in panoramic radiographs.

D B S Ladeira1, A D Cruz, S M Almeida, F N Bóscolo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the intergonial distance during the formation of panoramic radiographic images by means of horizontal and vertical measurements.
METHODS: 30 macerated mandibles were categorized into 3 different groups (n = 10) according to their intergonial distances as follows: G1, mean distance 8.2 cm, G2, mean distance 9.0 cm and G3, mean distance 9.6 cm. Three metal spheres 0.198 cm in diameter and placed at an incline using an isosceles triangle were separately placed over the internal and external surfaces of the mandibles before radiographic exposure for the purpose of taking the horizontal and vertical measurements. The occlusal planes of the mandibles were horizontally placed on the chin rest of the panoramic machine Orthopantomograph® OP 100 (Instrumentarium Imaging, Tuusula, Finland) and were then radiographed. In the panoramic radiographs, an expert radiologist measured the distances between the metal spheres in the horizontal and vertical directions using a digital caliper. The data were tabled and statistically analysed by Student's t-test and analysis of variance with Tukey post-test (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: In all three groups magnification of the distances between spheres was observed when compared with the real distance in both horizontal and vertical measurements (p < 0.05). Differences in both horizontal and vertical measurements were observed between the different regions (p < 0.05), however there were no differences between groups in the same region (p > 0.05). Differences between horizontal and vertical measurements were observed in different regions in all evaluated groups (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The intergonial distance is a factor that had no influence on image formation in the panoramic radiograph.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22282504      PMCID: PMC3520349          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/59761876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  27 in total

1.  Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiography.

Authors:  R Schulze; F Krummenauer; F Schalldach; B d'Hoedt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Accuracy of linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs taken at various positions in vitro.

Authors:  Steve Stramotas; Joseph P Geenty; Peter Petocz; M Ali Darendeliler
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Evaluation of the panoramic image formation in different anatomic positions.

Authors:  Daniela Brait Silva Ladeira; Adriana Dibo da Cruz; Solange Maria de Almeida; Frab Norberto Bóscolo
Journal:  Braz Dent J       Date:  2010

4.  A study of the focal troughs of three panoramic dental x-ray machines. Part II. Image dimensions.

Authors:  L R Manson-Hing; T M Lund
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1975-04

5.  Characteristics of the Orthopantomograph OP 100.

Authors:  W C Scarfe; F E Eraso; A G Farman
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  The use of panoramic radiographs to measure alveolar bone areas.

Authors:  R J Wilding; I Levin; R Pepper
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.837

7.  The central plane of the image layer determined experimentally in various rotational panoramic x-ray machines.

Authors:  B J Glass; W D McDavid; U Welander; C R Morris
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1985-07

8.  Comparison of image layer location among panoramic machines of the same manufacturer.

Authors:  T F Razmus; B J Glass; W D McDavid
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1989-01

9.  Morphometric analysis of image distortion with rotational panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Y Hayakawa; M Wakoh; H Fujimori; Y Ohta; K Kuroyanagi
Journal:  Bull Tokyo Dent Coll       Date:  1993-05

10.  Layer thickness in panoramic radiography as defined by different noise-equivalent passbands.

Authors:  M Shiojima; A Bäckström; U Welander; W D McDavid; G Tronje; M Naitoh
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1993-08
View more
  6 in total

1.  Root proximity of miniscrews at a variety of maxillary and mandibular buccal sites: Reliability of panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Jae-Hwa An; Yong-Il Kim; Seong-Sik Kim; Soo-Byung Park; Woo-Sung Son; Sung-Hun Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Use of digital panoramic radiography as an auxiliary means of low bone mineral density detection in post-menopausal women.

Authors:  C S Valerio; A M Trindade; E T Mazzieiro; T P Amaral; F R Manzi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Formation of ghost images due to metal objects on the surface of the patient's face: A pictorial essay.

Authors:  Bárbara Couto Ramos; Bruna Raquel da Silva Izar; Jéssica Lourdes Costa Pereira; Priscilla Sena Souza; Claudia Scigliano Valerio; Fabrício Mesquita Tuji; Flávio Ricardo Manzi
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2016-03-24

4.  Distortion of digital panoramic radiographs used for implant site assessment.

Authors:  Rayyan Abdulhamid Kayal
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

5.  The magnification in the lower third and second molar region in the digital panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Giedrė Trakiniene; Antanas Šidlauskas; Vilma Švalkauskienė; Dalia Smailienė; Julija Urbonė
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2017 May-Aug

6.  Accuracy of Panoramic Radiography for Degenerative Changes of the Temporomandibular Joint.

Authors:  Silvio R Oliveira; Rudyard Dos Santos Oliveira; Ernesto D Rodrigues; José Luiz C Junqueira; Francine K Panzarella
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2020-02-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.