Literature DB >> 1727344

Computed radiography in musculoskeletal imaging: state of the art.

M D Murphey1, J L Quale, N L Martin, J M Bramble, L T Cook, S J Dwyer.   

Abstract

Computed radiography is a 2K x 2K x 10 bit digital radiographic system that replaces the film-screen combination with a photo-stimulable phosphor plate. The advantages of this relatively new technology include linear detector response, improved detector efficiency, and digital processing capabilities. Musculoskeletal applications benefit significantly from these attributes, which result clinically in the ability to reduce both radiation dose and number of exposures. Studies of observers' performance have shown no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between film-screen and computed radiographic musculoskeletal images. Computed radiography is particularly useful in the evaluation of the musculoskeletal system in traumatized patients with portable radiographs, spine radiographs, scoliosis studies, and depiction of soft-tissue abnormalities. Limitations include change in image format and size, high cost, decreased spatial resolution, restricted throughput, increased perception of noise, and new artifacts that must be recognized. Spatial resolution limitations of computed radiography in identification of fine detail information can be improved by using magnification techniques. Radiation dose reduction with an exposure decrease of 25-50% can be achieved without loss of diagnostic accuracy, although this depends on the examination and the abnormality. An interactive workstation is important in the use of a computed radiographic system with capabilities to adjust display parameters to best depict images and disease. We conclude that computed radiography is an alternative to film-screen radiography without significant differences in diagnostic quality in the evaluation of musculoskeletal images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1727344     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.158.1.1727344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

Review 1.  Digital radiography. A comparison with modern conventional imaging.

Authors:  G J Bansal
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  A comparison of hard and soft copies processed with linear conversion and nonlinear conversion of skeletal fractures--a preliminary study.

Authors:  T Kaji; M Katayama; S Kosuda; S Kusano
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Report on a new type of trauma full-body digital X-ray machine.

Authors:  S Beningfield; H Potgieter; A Nicol; S van As; G Bowie; E Hering; E Lätti
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2003-04-09

4.  Comparison of stimulable phosphor technology and conventional screen-film technology in pediatric scoliosis.

Authors:  D A Stringer; R A Cairns; K J Poskitt; H Bray; R Milner; B Kennedy
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1994

5.  EOS imaging versus current radiography: A health technology assessment study.

Authors:  Alireza Mahboub-Ahari; Sakineh Hajebrahimi; Mahmoud Yusefi; Ashraf Velayati
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-02-17

6.  Comparison of computed radiography and film/screen combination using a contrast-detail phantom.

Authors:  Z F Lu; E L Nickoloff; J C So; A K Dutta
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.