Literature DB >> 19037669

Observer reliability between juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in measurement of stable Cobb's angle.

Hitesh N Modi1, Ting Chen, Seung Woo Suh, Satyen Mehta, S Srinivasalu, Jae-Hyuk Yang, Hae-Ryong Song.   

Abstract

It is a measurement of Cobb's angles between adolescent (AIS) and juvenile (JIS) idiopathic scoliosis who had stable curves (variation <5 degrees) in more than three visits. Main objective of this paper is to measure inter- and intra-observer reliability of measurements between AIS and JIS who had stable curves in regular follow-up. Twenty-nine JIS and 44 AIS patients who had stable curves without bracing were identified using PACS system. Two observers independently measured Cobb's angle twice on first, during follow-up and final radiogram using computer-based digital radiogram. Both observers were given pre-decided level of upper and lower end plates. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the measurement was calculated using Pearson correlation-coefficient test between JIS and AIS group. There was no significant difference in Cobb's angle in all measurements by both observers either in JIS (p = 0.756, range 0.706-0.815; ANOVA) or AIS (p = 0.871, range 0.795-0.929; ANOVA) group which suggested that there is no significant difference in Cobb's angle in repeated measurements. Intra-observer reliability for JIS (r = 0.600, range 0.521-0.751; Pearson test) was less than AIS (r = 0.969, range 0.943-0.984; Pearson test); and similarly, inter-observer reliability for JIS (r = 0.547, Pearson test) was also less than AIS (r = 0.961, Pearson test) which indicates that Cobb's angle measurement is less reliable in patients who have juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. Using the identical condition for measurements in both the groups, we could find only one reason for less reliability in JIS group and that is poor demarcation of the vertebral end-plates in this group. This poor inter- and intra-observer reliability in JIS due to ill-defined endplates can be reduced by measuring all previous curves along with latest curves at the same time during the follow-up of patients with JIS to decide about the progression of curves and treatment options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19037669      PMCID: PMC2615120          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0834-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

1.  Intra-observer reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the radiographic parameters in the Spinal Deformity Study Group's AIS Radiographic Measurement Manual.

Authors:  Natasha Radhika Dang; Marc J Moreau; Douglas L Hill; James K Mahood; James Raso
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Digital radiography. A comparison with modern conventional imaging.

Authors:  G J Bansal
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. Intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles.

Authors:  K G Shea; P M Stevens; M Nelson; J T Smith; K S Masters; S Yandow
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation.

Authors:  D L Carman; R H Browne; J G Birch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error.

Authors:  R T Morrissy; G S Goldsmith; E C Hall; D Kehl; G H Cowie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Timothy R Kuklo; Benjamin K Potter; Teresa M Schroeder; Michael F O'Brien
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Reliability analysis for digital adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.

Authors:  Timothy R Kuklo; Benjamin K Potter; Michael F O'Brien; Teresa M Schroeder; Lawrence G Lenke; David W Polly
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-04

8.  Reliability analysis for manual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.

Authors:  Timothy R Kuklo; Benjamin K Potter; David W Polly; Michael F O'Brien; Teresa M Schroeder; Lawrence G Lenke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; David D Aronsson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The assessment of intraobserver and interobserver error in the measurement of noncongenital scoliosis in children < or = 10 years of age.

Authors:  Randall T Loder; David Spiegel; Sarah Gutknecht; Kenneth Kleist; Thuan Ly; Amir Mehbod
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  To what degree is digital imaging reliable? Validation of femoral neck shaft angle measurement in the era of picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  J D Wilson; W Eardley; S Odak; A Jennings
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Automatic quantification of spinal curvature in scoliotic radiograph using image processing.

Authors:  Anitha H; G K Prabhu
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the Cobb angle and assessing sagittal plane by computer-assisted and manual measurement tools.

Authors:  Weifei Wu; Jie Liang; Yuanli Du; Xiaoyi Tan; Xuanping Xiang; Wanhong Wang; Neng Ru; Jinbo Le
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Comparison of spinal curvature parameters as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and the Cobb method in children with scoliosis.

Authors:  Mária Takács; Zsanett Orlovits; Bence Jáger; Rita M Kiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Reversal of childhood idiopathic scoliosis in an adult, without surgery: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  William J Brooks; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Martha C Hawes
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-12-15

6.  Relationship between thoracic kyphosis and neural axis abnormalities in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  I Swarup; P Derman; E Sheha; J Nguyen; J Blanco; R Widmann
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.