Literature DB >> 16813040

Some determinants of changes in preference over time.

Gregory P Hanley1, Brian A Iwata, Eileen M Roscoe.   

Abstract

Results of longitudinal studies suggest that the stability of preferences varies across individuals, although it is unclear what variables account for these differences. We extended this work by conducting periodic assessments of preference for leisure activities over 3 to 6 months with 10 adults with developmental disabilities. Although previous research has collectively shown that preferences identified via repeated assessment are highly variable, our results showed that preferences were relatively stable for the majority (80%) of participants. In an attempt to identify some environmental determinants of shifts in preference, we provided extended daily access to high-preference items (preference-weakening manipulation) and paired access to low-preference items with social and edible putative reinforcers during brief sessions (preference-strengthening manipulation). Preference assessments continued over the course of these manipulations with 2 participants. Results showed that changes in preference across time could be produced systematically and suggest that naturally occurring changes in establishing operations or conditioning histories contribute to temporal shifts in preference. Implications for preference assessments, reinforcer usage, and planned attempts to change preferences are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16813040      PMCID: PMC1479785          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2006.163-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  22 in total

1.  Response-restriction analysis: II. Alteration of activity preferences.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Eileen M Roscoe; Rachel H Thompson; Jana S Lindberg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

2.  On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.

Authors:  W W Fisher; R H Thompson; C C Piazza; K Crosland; D Gotjen
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

3.  Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.

Authors:  H S Roane; T R Vollmer; J E Ringdahl; B A Marcus
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

4.  Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.

Authors:  W W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; A Amari
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1996-07

5.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

6.  Establishing operations.

Authors:  J Michael
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1993

7.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

8.  Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli.

Authors:  J Michael
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior.

Authors:  D V Cicchetti; S A Sparrow
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1981-09

10.  Assessing food preferences among persons with profound mental retardation: providing opportunities to make choices.

Authors:  M B Parsons; D H Reid
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1990
View more
  14 in total

1.  Using negative reinforcement to increase self-feeding in a child with food selectivity.

Authors:  Petula C M Vaz; Valerie M Volkert; Cathleen C Piazza
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

2.  Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value.

Authors:  Iser G DeLeon; Meagan K Gregory; Michelle A Frank-Crawford; Melissa J Allman; Arthur E Wilke; Abbey B Carreau-Webster; Mandy M Triggs
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

3.  Tests of behavioral-economic assessments of relative reinforcer efficacy: economic substitutes.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; John R Smethells; Eric E Ewan; Steven R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The effects of reinforcer pairing and fading on preschoolers' snack selections.

Authors:  Katherine M Solberg; Gregory P Hanley; Stacy A Layer; Einar T Ingvarsson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

5.  Predicting preference for items during periods of extended access based on early response allocation.

Authors:  John T Rapp; Nairim C Rojas; Amanda M Colby-Dirksen; Greg J Swanson; Kendra L Marvin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010

6.  Rapid Assessment of Attention Types for the Treatment of Attention-Maintained Problem Behavior.

Authors:  Craig W Strohmeier; Carolyn Crysdale; Suni Schwandtner
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2018-09-28

7.  Correspondence between single versus daily preference assessment outcomes and reinforcer efficacy under progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  Nathan A Call; Nicole M Trosclair-Lasserre; Addie J Findley; Andrea R Reavis; M Alice Shillingsburg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

8.  Increasing accurate preference assessment implementation through pyramidal training.

Authors:  Sacha T Pence; Claire C St Peter; Allison S Tetreault
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

Review 9.  Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

Authors:  Jordan D Lill; Mark D Shriver; Keith D Allen
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-04-30

10.  Teacher report and direct assessment of preferences for identifying reinforcers for young children.

Authors:  Catherine A Cote; Rachel H Thompson; Gregory P Hanley; Paige M McKerchar
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.