Literature DB >> 4044458

Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

G M Pace, M T Ivancic, G L Edwards, B A Iwata, T J Page.   

Abstract

We evaluated a procedure for identifying potential reinforcers with profoundly retarded individuals. In Experiment 1, six persons were repeatedly exposed to 16 stimuli, and approach behaviors to each stimulus were used to identify preferred and nonpreferred stimuli. In Experiment 2, we examined the reinforcing properties of preferred and nonpreferred stimuli by delivering them contingently on the occurrence of arbitrarily selected responses. Results revealed that the preferred stimulus conditions typically produced higher rates of responding than did either the baseline or the nonpreferred stimulus conditions, suggesting that the procedure can be used to assess reinforcer value for individuals with limited behavioral repertoires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4044458      PMCID: PMC1308015          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  7 in total

1.  Reduction in rate of multiple tics by free operant conditioning methods.

Authors:  B H BARRETT
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1962-09       Impact factor: 2.254

2.  Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.

Authors:  D M Baer; M M Wolf; T R Risley
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1968

3.  Some motivational properties of sensory stimulation in psychotic children.

Authors:  A Rincover; C D Newsom; O I Lovaas; R L Koegel
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1977-10

4.  Evaluation of entertainment materials for severely retarded persons.

Authors:  J E Favell; P R Cannon
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1977-01

5.  A comparison of two procedures for programming the differential reinforcement of other behaviors.

Authors:  A C Repp; L E Barton; A R Brulle
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1983

6.  Reinforcer variation: implications for motivating developmentally disabled children.

Authors:  A L Egel
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1981

7.  The limits and motivating potential of sensory stimuli as reinforcers for autistic children.

Authors:  M Ferrari; S L Harris
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1981
  7 in total
  104 in total

1.  Effects of reinforcement for alternative behavior during punishment of self-injury.

Authors:  R H Thompson; B A Iwata; J Conners; E M Roscoe
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

2.  Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences.

Authors:  G P Hanley; B A Iwata; J S Lindberg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

3.  The effects of presession exposure to attention on the results of assessments of attention as a reinforcer.

Authors:  W K Berg; S Peck; D P Wacker; J Harding; J McComas; D Richman; K Brown
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

4.  An analysis of choice making in the assessment of young children with severe behavior problems.

Authors:  J W Harding; D P Wacker; W K Berg; L J Cooper; J Asmus; K Mlela; J Muller
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

5.  Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata; J Conners; M D Wallace
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

6.  Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.

Authors:  L P Hagopian; K S Rush; A B Lewin; E S Long
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

7.  Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; W W Fisher; V Rodriguez-Catter; K Maglieri; K Herman; J M Marhefka
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

8.  Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Jana S Lindberg; Juliet Conners
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

9.  Effects of task difficulty and type of contingency on students' allocation of responding to math worksheets.

Authors:  Amanda L Lannie; Brian K Martens
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2004

10.  Direct and distal effects of noncontingent juice on rumination exhibited by a child with autism.

Authors:  Megan L Kliebert; Jeffrey H Tiger
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.