Literature DB >> 9891397

Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.

H S Roane1, T R Vollmer, J E Ringdahl, B A Marcus.   

Abstract

We evaluated the utility of a brief (5-min) stimulus preference assessment for individuals with developmental disabilities. Participants had noncontingent (free) access to an array of stimuli and could interact with any of the stimuli at any time. Stimuli were never withdrawn or withheld from the participants during a 5-min session. In Experiment 1, the brief preference assessment was conducted for 10 participants to identify differentially preferred stimuli, and reinforcer assessments were conducted to test the reinforcing efficacy of those stimuli identified as highly preferred. In Experiment 2, a comparison was conducted between the brief preference assessment and a commonly used paired-stimulus preference assessment. Collectively, results demonstrated that the brief preference assessment identified stimuli that functioned as reinforcers for a simple operant response, identified preferred stimuli that were differentially effective as reinforcers compared to nonpreferred stimuli, was associated with fewer problem behaviors, and required less time to complete than a commonly used paired-stimulus preference assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9891397      PMCID: PMC1284151          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  20 in total

1.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

2.  A practical strategy for ongoing reinforcer assessment.

Authors:  S A Mason; G G McGee; V Farmer-Dougan; T R Risley
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1989

3.  Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences.

Authors:  C W Green; D H Reid; L K White; R C Halford; D P Brittain; S M Gardner
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1988

4.  Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals.

Authors:  J Dattilo
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1986

5.  Programmed instruction for institutionalized offenders: contingency management and performance contracts.

Authors:  C B Clements; J M McKee
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1968-06

6.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

7.  An indirect technique for establishing preferences for categories of reinforcement for severely and profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  A F Rotatori; B Fox; H Switzky
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1979-06

8.  The competition of autistic stereotyped behavior with usual and specially assessed reinforcers.

Authors:  K Dyer
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1987

9.  Establishing operations and reinforcement effects.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1991

10.  Training mentally retarded adolescents to brush their teeth.

Authors:  R D Horner; I Keilitz
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1975
View more
  80 in total

1.  Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior.

Authors:  J S Lalli; T R Vollmer; P R Progar; C Wright; J Borrero; D Daniel; C H Barthold; K Tocco; W May
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

2.  Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.

Authors:  L P Hagopian; K S Rush; A B Lewin; E S Long
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

3.  Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; W W Fisher; V Rodriguez-Catter; K Maglieri; K Herman; J M Marhefka
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

4.  Reinforcement contingencies and social reinforcement: some reciprocal relations between basic and applied research.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

5.  Assessing reinforcers under progressive schedule requirements.

Authors:  H S Roane; D C Lerman; C M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

6.  Fixed-time schedule effects as a function of baseline reinforcement rate.

Authors:  J E Ringdahl; T R Vollmer; J C Borrero; J E Connell
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

Review 7.  Problem behavior interventions for young children with autism: a research synthesis.

Authors:  Robert H Horner; Edward G Carr; Phillip S Strain; Anne W Todd; Holly K Reed
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2002-10

8.  Using a chaser to decrease packing in children with feeding disorders.

Authors:  Petula C M Vaz; Cathleen C Piazza; Victoria Stewart; Valerie M Volkert; Rebecca A Groff; Meeta R Patel
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

9.  Progressing from programmatic to discovery research: a case example with the overjustification effect.

Authors:  Henry S Roane; Wayne W Fisher; Erin M McDonough
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

10.  Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Jana S Lindberg; Juliet Conners
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.