Literature DB >> 7057126

Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli.

J Michael.   

Abstract

A discriminative stimulus is a stimulus condition which, (1) given the momentary effectiveness of some particular type of reinforcement (2) increases the frequency of a particular type of response (3) because that stimulus condition has been correlated with an increase in the frequency with which that type of response has been followed by that type of reinforcement. Operations such as deprivation have two different effects on behavior. One is to increase the effectiveness of some object or event as reinforcement, and the other is to evoke the behavior that has in the past been followed by that object or event. "Establishing operation" is suggested as a general term for operations having these two effects. A number of situations involve what is generally assumed to be a discriminative stimulus relation, but with the third defining characteristic of the discriminative stimulus absent. Here the stimulus change functions more like an establishing operation than a discriminative stimulus, and the new term, "establishing stimulus," is suggested. There are three other possible approaches to this terminological problem, but none are entirely satisfactory.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7057126      PMCID: PMC1333126          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  1 in total

1.  Animals and children.

Authors:  F S KELLER
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1950-03
  1 in total
  217 in total

1.  The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes.

Authors:  J M Gottschalk; M E Libby; R B Graff
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

Review 2.  An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement.

Authors:  C C Piazza; J D Adelinis; G P Hanley; H L Goh; M D Delia
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Relative influences of establishing operations and reinforcement contingencies on self-injurious behavior during functional analyses.

Authors:  A S Worsdell; B A Iwata; J Conners; S W Kahng; R H Thompson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

4.  Escape behavior during academic tasks: a preliminary analysis of idiosyncratic establishing operations.

Authors:  J McComas; H Hoch; D Paone; D El-Roy
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

5.  The effects of presession exposure to attention on the results of assessments of attention as a reinforcer.

Authors:  W K Berg; S Peck; D P Wacker; J Harding; J McComas; D Richman; K Brown
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

6.  Behavior analysis and revaluation.

Authors:  J W Donahoe; J E Burgos
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of noncontingent reinforcement on problem behavior and stimulus engagement: the role of satiation, extinction, and alternative reinforcement.

Authors:  L P Hagopian; J L Crockett; M van Stone; I G DeLeon; L G Bowman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

8.  Current research on the influence of establishing operations on behavior in applied settings.

Authors:  B A Iwata; R G Smith; J Michael
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

9.  Competition between noncontingent and contingent reinforcement schedules during response acquisition.

Authors:  H L Goh; B A Iwata; I G DeLeon
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

10.  The effects of presession attention on problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers.

Authors:  Jennifer J McComas; Andrea Thompson; LeAnne Johnson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.