Literature DB >> 21358906

Predicting preference for items during periods of extended access based on early response allocation.

John T Rapp1, Nairim C Rojas, Amanda M Colby-Dirksen, Greg J Swanson, Kendra L Marvin.   

Abstract

Top-ranked items were identified during 30-min free-operant preference assessments for 9 individuals. Data from each session were analyzed to identify the item (a) that was engaged with first in each session and (b) to which the most responding was allocated after 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 20 min, and 25 min had elapsed in each session. The results indicated that the first-engaged item and the 5-min high-allocation item predicted the top-ranked item in 55% and 62% of the sessions, respectively. The results also showed that engagement with the top-ranked item from the first session decreased across subsequent sessions for 6 of the 9 participants. The implications of the results for brief versus extended stimulus preference assessments are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extended assessment; free-operant stimulus preference assessment; multiple-stimulus without replacement; response allocation

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21358906      PMCID: PMC2938935          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  14 in total

Review 1.  An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement.

Authors:  C C Piazza; J D Adelinis; G P Hanley; H L Goh; M D Delia
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

2.  Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; W W Fisher; V Rodriguez-Catter; K Maglieri; K Herman; J M Marhefka
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

3.  Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Jana S Lindberg; Juliet Conners
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

4.  Duration-based measures of preference for vocational tasks.

Authors:  April S Worsdell; Brian A Iwata; Michele D Wallace
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

5.  Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.

Authors:  H S Roane; T R Vollmer; J E Ringdahl; B A Marcus
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

6.  Toward the development of structured criteria for interpretation of functional analysis data.

Authors:  L P Hagopian; W W Fisher; R H Thompson; J Owen-DeSchryver; B A Iwata; D P Wacker
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

7.  Noncontingent presentation of attention and alternative stimuli in the treatment of attention-maintained destructive behavior.

Authors:  G P Hanley; C C Piazza; W W Fisher
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

8.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

9.  Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata; E M Roscoe
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

10.  Within-session patterns of self-injury as indicators of behavioral function.

Authors:  T R Vollmer; B A Iwata; J R Zarcone; R G Smith; J L Mazaleski
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec
View more
  3 in total

1.  Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference.

Authors:  Iser G DeLeon; Julie A Chase; Michelle A Frank-Crawford; Abbey B Carreau-Webster; Mandy M Triggs; Christopher E Bullock; Heather K Jennett
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2014-04-30

Review 2.  Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

Authors:  Jordan D Lill; Mark D Shriver; Keith D Allen
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-04-30

3.  Use of Repeated Within-Subject Measures to Assess Infants' Preference for Similar Others.

Authors:  Amir Cruz-Khalili; Katrina Bettencourt; Carolynn S Kohn; Matthew P Normand; Henry D Schlinger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.