Literature DB >> 34868818

Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

Jordan D Lill1, Mark D Shriver1, Keith D Allen1.   

Abstract

A stimulus preference assessment (SPA) is a fundamental tool used by practitioners to predict stimuli that function as reinforcers. The Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) requires that all certified behavior analysts and behavioral technicians be trained in SPA methodology (BACB, 2017). SPA procedures are used by nearly 9 out of 10 behavior analysts in the field (Graff & Karsten, 2012). Over the last 4 decades, there has been a litany of research on SPA procedures. Despite the universality of training, application, and research, discussions on the selection of SPA procedures have been sparse. Two peer-reviewed articles have focused on clinical decision making in the selection of SPA procedures. Karsten et al. (2011) introduced an in situ decision-making model, whereas Virues-Ortega et al. (2014) developed an a priori algorithm based on client and stimuli characteristics. The SPADS addresses the limitations of prior models by considering the effects of stimuli dimensions, client characteristics, relative administration times, and the outcomes agreement between two potentially efficacious, context-specfic SPA procedures. © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical practice; Decision making; Preference assessment

Year:  2021        PMID: 34868818      PMCID: PMC8586311          DOI: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Anal Pract        ISSN: 1998-1929


  57 in total

1.  Response-restriction analysis: II. Alteration of activity preferences.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Eileen M Roscoe; Rachel H Thompson; Jana S Lindberg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

2.  A comprehensive evaluation of reinforcer identification processes for persons with profound multiple handicaps.

Authors:  C W Green; D H Reid; V S Canipe; S M Gardner
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1991

3.  Description of a practitioner model for identifying preferred stimuli with individuals with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Amanda M Karsten; James E Carr; Tracy L Lepper
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2011-07

4.  Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.

Authors:  C C Piazza; W W Fisher; L P Hagopian; L G Bowman; L Toole
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

5.  Comparison of edible and leisure reinforcers.

Authors:  Tara A Fahmie; Brian A Iwata; Kathryn E Jann
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2015-04-17

6.  The Impact of Stimulus Presentation and Size on Preference.

Authors:  James W Moore; Keith C Radley; Evan H Dart; Heather M Whipple; Emily J Ness; Ashley N Murphy; Chris Furlow; Joy K Wimberly; Ashley Smith
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2016-09-21

7.  Restricted Interests and Autism: Further Assessment of Preferences for a Variety of Leisure Items.

Authors:  Monica A Spear; Amanda Karsten; Emily A White
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2017-01-10

8.  Preference testing: a comparison of two presentation methods.

Authors:  J Windsor; L M Piché; P A Locke
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec

9.  Current limits to reinforcer identification for some persons with profound multiple disabilities.

Authors:  M T Ivancic; J S Bailey
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb

10.  Problem behavior during preference assessments: an empirical analysis and practical recommendations.

Authors:  Soyeon Kang; Russell B Lang; Mark F O'Reilly; Tonya N Davis; Wendy Machalicek; Mandy J Rispoli; Jeffrey M Chan
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.