Literature DB >> 18189095

The effects of reinforcer pairing and fading on preschoolers' snack selections.

Katherine M Solberg1, Gregory P Hanley, Stacy A Layer, Einar T Ingvarsson.   

Abstract

The effects of reinforcement pairing and fading on preschoolers' snack selections were evaluated in a multiple baseline design. Baseline preferences for snack options were assessed via repeated paired-item preference assessments. Edible, social, and activity-based reinforcers were then exclusively paired with a less preferred snack option. Once the snack paired with reinforcement was selected most frequently, the three types of reinforcement were systematically faded. Frequent selections of the previously less preferred snack option were produced with paired reinforcement, but were disrupted for all children as the paired reinforcement was reduced to low levels. These data showed that paired reinforcement was initially effective in increasing preference for the originally less preferred snack options, but more permanent changes in the value of the snack options were not achieved. Conditions for producing persistent changes in children's snack choices are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18189095      PMCID: PMC2078571          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2007.633-644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  12 in total

1.  Using a fading procedure to increase fluid consumption in a child with feeding problems.

Authors:  M R Patel; C C Piazza; L Kelly; C A Ochsner; C M Santana
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  Response-restriction analysis: II. Alteration of activity preferences.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Eileen M Roscoe; Rachel H Thompson; Jana S Lindberg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

3.  Using simultaneous presentation to increase vegetable consumption in a mildly selective child with autism.

Authors:  William H Ahearn
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

4.  Increasing variety of foods consumed by blending nonpreferred foods into preferred foods.

Authors:  Michael M Mueller; Cathleen C Piazza; Meeta R Patel; Michael E Kelley; Angela Pruett
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2004

5.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

6.  Some determinants of changes in preference over time.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Eileen M Roscoe
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2006

7.  Combining stimulus fading, reinforcement, and extinction to treat food refusal.

Authors:  K A Freeman; C C Piazza
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

8.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

9.  A comparison of simultaneous and delayed reinforcement as treatments for food selectivity.

Authors:  L Kern; T J Marder
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

10.  An evaluation of simultaneous and sequential presentation of preferred and nonpreferred food to treat food selectivity.

Authors:  Cathleen C Piazza; Meeta R Patel; Christine M Santana; Han Leong Goh; Michael D Delia; Blake M Lancaster
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.

Authors:  Justin D Smith
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-07-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.