Literature DB >> 16812484

Topographical variations in behavior during autoshaping, automaintenance, and omission training.

G D Eldridge, J J Pear.   

Abstract

Three pigeons were exposed to an autoshaping and automaintenance procedure while a computer-controlled tracking system continuously recorded the position of the bird's head as it moved freely in the experimental chamber. Although only 2 birds pecked the key during the conditional stimulus (red keylight), all 3 birds exhibited stable patterns of approaching the conditional stimulus and withdrawing from the intertrial stimulus (white keylight). Subsequent exposure to an omission procedure, in which pecks on the red key cancelled the presentation of food upon the termination of the red keylight, greatly reduced key pecking, but approaching and pecking in the vicinity of the conditional stimulus were maintained at high levels. When the omission contingency was removed key pecking increased. During all phases the birds withdrew from the area of the white key and engaged in repetitive back-and-forth or circuiting movements during this intertrial stimulus. The data document (a) the strong control the conditional stimulus in autoshaping and automaintenance exerts over approach to the key and pecking motions whether or not the conditional stimulus elicits key pecking at a high level; and (b) withdrawal from the vicinity of the key and the occurrence of stereotypic behavior during the intertrial interval.

Year:  1987        PMID: 16812484      PMCID: PMC1348315          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  The effects of reinforcement upon the prepecking behaviors of pigeons in the autoshaping experiment.

Authors:  M G Wessells
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Centrifugal selection of signal-directed pecking.

Authors:  F J Barrera
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Spatiotemporal patterns of behavior produced by variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Autoshaping: further study of "negative automaintenance".

Authors:  W T Woodard; J C Ballinger; M E Bitterman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The operant-respondent distinction: Future directions.

Authors:  J J Pear; G D Eldridge
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Pavlovian appetitive contingencies and approach versus withdrawal to conditioned stimuli in pigeons.

Authors:  E A Wasserman; S R Franklin; E Hearst
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1974-04

9.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The basis of superstitious behavior: chance contingency, stimulus substitution, or appetitive behavior?

Authors:  W Timberlake; G A Lucas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Behavioral stereotypy and the generalized matching equation.

Authors:  J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Negative automaintenance omission training is effective.

Authors:  Federico Sanabria; Matthew T Sitomer; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Observation of behavior, inference of function, and the study of learning.

Authors:  W Timberlake; F J Silva
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

4.  Stimulus-food pairings produce stimulus-directed touch-screen responding in cynomolgus monkeys (macaca fascicularis) with or without a positive response contingency.

Authors:  Christopher E Bullock; Todd M Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Sign- versus goal-tracking: effects of conditioned-stimulus-to-unconditioned-stimulus distance.

Authors:  F J Silva; K M Silva; J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  An omission procedure reorganizes the microstructure of sign-tracking while preserving incentive salience.

Authors:  Stephen E Chang; Kyle S Smith
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.460

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.