Literature DB >> 16811786

Autoshaping: further study of "negative automaintenance".

W T Woodard, J C Ballinger, M E Bitterman.   

Abstract

The key pecking of pigeons was autoshaped to three key colors paired with food in discrete trials. Then, the effects of three different color-correlated contingencies were compared: reward (presentation of food contingent on pecking), omission (presentation of food prevented by pecking), and extinction (no food). Two measures of performance were used: initial response (the number of trials with each color on which at least one peck was made) and multiple response (the total number of pecks per trial). In general, the reward color produced more pecking than the omission color, the omission color more than the extinction color, and the extinction color more than on blank trials with an unlighted key, although (relative to reward) omission produced a higher level of initial than of multiple responding. These results point clearly to the importance of stimulus-reinforcer continguity in the control of pecking.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811786      PMCID: PMC1333240          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  Eliminating behavior with reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Differential reinforcement and stimulus control of not responding.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Food-avoidance in hungry pigeons, and other perplexities.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Pavlovian analysis of avoidance conditioning in the goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Authors:  W T Woodard; M E Bitterman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1973-01
  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Topographical variations in behavior during autoshaping, automaintenance, and omission training.

Authors:  G D Eldridge; J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Negative automaintenance omission training is effective.

Authors:  Federico Sanabria; Matthew T Sitomer; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The "where is it?" reflex: autoshaping the orienting response.

Authors:  G Buzsáki
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Accounting for negative automaintenance in pigeons: a dual learning systems approach and factored representations.

Authors:  Florian Lesaint; Olivier Sigaud; Mehdi Khamassi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  An omission procedure reorganizes the microstructure of sign-tracking while preserving incentive salience.

Authors:  Stephen E Chang; Kyle S Smith
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.460

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.