Literature DB >> 16903489

Negative automaintenance omission training is effective.

Federico Sanabria1, Matthew T Sitomer, Peter R Killeen.   

Abstract

Twelve pigeons were exposed to negative automaintenance contingencies for 17-27 sessions immediately after brief (14-16 sessions) or extended (168-237 sessions) exposure to positive automaintenance contingencies, or after 4-10 sessions of instrumental training. In all conditions, negative automaintenance contingencies virtually eliminated responding, reducing response rates to an average 1.3 responses per min. This reduction in response rate was validated by a model of transition between early and late response rates that assumed exponential transition of rates from one set of contingencies to the next. The model faithfully reproduced cumulative records, and yielded estimates of terminal rates under negative automaintenance that were close to operant level.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16903489      PMCID: PMC1601948          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2006.36-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  29 in total

1.  Complex dynamic processes in sign tracking with an omission contingency (negative automaintenance).

Authors:  Peter R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2003-01

2.  "Automaintenance": the role of reinforcement.

Authors:  S R Hursh; D J Navarick; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Within-session Changes In Responding During Autoshaping And Automaintenance Procedures.

Authors:  F McSweeney; S Swindell; J Weatherly
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Autoshaping: further study of "negative automaintenance".

Authors:  W T Woodard; J C Ballinger; M E Bitterman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Topographical variations in behavior during autoshaping, automaintenance, and omission training.

Authors:  G D Eldridge; J J Pear
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Autoshaping and automaintenance of a key-press response in squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  E Gamzu; E Schwam
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  "Turning back the clock" on serial-stimulus sign tracking.

Authors:  R W Allan; T J Matthews
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Autoshaping, random control, and omission training in the rat.

Authors:  C Locurto; H S Terrace; J Gibbon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  Rethinking reinforcement: allocation, induction, and contingency.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Autoshaping and automaintenance: a neural-network approach.

Authors:  José E Burgos
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 4.  Adjunctive behaviors are operants.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Ricardo Pellón
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Translations in Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations.

Authors:  Stephanie P da Silva; April Michele Williams
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-25

6.  Stimulus-food pairings produce stimulus-directed touch-screen responding in cynomolgus monkeys (macaca fascicularis) with or without a positive response contingency.

Authors:  Christopher E Bullock; Todd M Myers
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  A computational formulation of the behavior systems account of the temporal organization of motivated behavior.

Authors:  Federico Sanabria; Carter W Daniels; Tanya Gupta; Cristina Santos
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  The dynamics of conditioning and extinction.

Authors:  Peter R Killeen; Federico Sanabria; Igor Dolgov
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-10

9.  The attribution of incentive salience to Pavlovian alcohol cues: a shift from goal-tracking to sign-tracking.

Authors:  Chandra S Srey; Jean-Marie N Maddux; Nadia Chaudhri
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Accounting for negative automaintenance in pigeons: a dual learning systems approach and factored representations.

Authors:  Florian Lesaint; Olivier Sigaud; Mehdi Khamassi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.