Literature DB >> 16811909

Preference for mixed versus constant delay of reinforcement.

R A Cicerone.   

Abstract

Preference for constant and mixed delay of reinforcement was studied using concurrent equal variable-interval schedules. For four pigeons, pecking one key was reinforced following constant delays of 8 sec and mixed delays of 6 or 10 and 2 or 14 sec. Pecking a second key was reinforced following constant delays of 0, 8, 16, and 32 sec. For two additional pigeons, pecking one key was reinforced following delays of 30, 15 or 45, 5 or 55, and 0 or 60 sec. Reinforcements on the other key were delayed 30 sec. It was found that (a) pigeons preferred mixed relative to constant delay of reinforcement, and (b) preference for mixed delay of reinforcement increased as the range of delay interval variability increased.

Year:  1976        PMID: 16811909      PMCID: PMC1333458          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  DECISION MAKING BY RATS: UNCERTAIN OUTCOME CHOICES.

Authors:  F A LOGAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-04

3.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  S H Chung; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Some factors controlling preference between fixed-ratio and variable-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J A Sherman; J R Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Constant versus variable delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  B H PUBOLS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1962-02

7.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation.

Authors:  S H Chung
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  27 in total

1.  Designing interventions that include delayed reinforcement: implications of recent laboratory research.

Authors:  R Stromer; J J McComas; R A Rehfeldt
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

2.  The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Benjamin P Kowal; Eric S Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Choice with delayed and probabilistic reinforcers: effects of variability, time between trials, and conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur; A Romano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior.

Authors:  Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Response rate and changeover performance on concurrent variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  I W Hunter; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Preference for mixed versus constant delays of reinforcement: Effect of probability of the short, mixed delay.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The effect of variable delays on self-control.

Authors:  J J Chelonis; G King; A W Logue; H Tobin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The influence of prior choices on current choice.

Authors:  Xochitl de la Piedad; Douglas Field; Howard Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.