Literature DB >> 5851405

Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation.

S H Chung.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained to peck either of two response keys for food reinforcement on equated aperiodic schedules. Delays of reinforcement for pecks at one key reduced the relative frequency of pecking exponentially as a function of the delay interval. Similar functions were obtained when other dependent variables were plotted against the delay interval.

Mesh:

Year:  1965        PMID: 5851405      PMCID: PMC1338130          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESPONSES PER REINFORCEMENT AND PREFERENCE DURING CONCURRENT. VI.

Authors:  S H REVUSKY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  EFFECTS OF EFFORT ON RESPONSE RATE.

Authors:  S H CHUNG
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The effect of multiple S delta periods on responding on a fixed-interval schedule.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Free-operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement. I. CRF-type schedules.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-04
  7 in total
  45 in total

1.  The Harvard Pigeon Lab under Herrnstein.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effect of reinforcer delays on the form of the forgetting function.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sargisson; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Toward an operant model of power in organizations.

Authors:  Sonia M Goltz
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2003

Review 4.  Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior.

Authors:  Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Delayed reinforcement versus reinforcement after a fixed interval.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for mixed versus constant delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  R A Cicerone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers.

Authors:  V Hollard; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice and delay of reinforcement: Effects of terminal-link stimulus and response conditions.

Authors:  T Omino; M Ito
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice and reinforcement delay.

Authors:  G D Gentry; M J Marr
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Delayed reinforcement in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  D M Wilkie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.