Literature DB >> 16811307

Choice and delay of reinforcement.

S H Chung, R J Herrnstein.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained to peck either of two response keys for food reinforcement on equated aperiodic schedules. The distribution of responding at the two keys was studied as reinforcement was delayed for various durations. The relative frequency of responding at each key was shown to match the relative immediacy of reinforcement, immediacy defined as the reciprocal of the delay of reinforcement.

Year:  1967        PMID: 16811307      PMCID: PMC1338319          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Free-operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement. I. CRF-type schedules.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-04

5.  Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation.

Authors:  S H Chung
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total
  148 in total

1.  Pigeons may not remember the stimuli that reinforced their recent behavior.

Authors:  D W Schaal; A L Odum; T A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Three predictions of the economic concept of unit price in a choice context.

Authors:  G J Madden; W K Bickel; E A Jacobs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Time and memory: towards a pacemaker-free theory of interval timing.

Authors:  J E Staddon; J J Higa
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of primary reinforcement on pigeons' initial-link responding under a concurrent chains schedule with nondifferntial terminal links.

Authors:  B O Ploog
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement on choice.

Authors:  M A McDevitt; B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Pigeon Lab notable experience.

Authors:  N H Azrin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  From programmed instruction to pigeons.

Authors:  Robert A Boakes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The Harvard Pigeon Lab under Herrnstein.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Context matters: my education at the Harvard Pigeon Lab.

Authors:  Terry W Belke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The living legacy of the Harvard Pigeon Lab: quantitative analysis in the wide world.

Authors:  A W Logue
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.