Literature DB >> 16812737

The effect of variable delays on self-control.

J J Chelonis, G King, A W Logue, H Tobin.   

Abstract

Five pigeons served as subjects in an experiment that examined the effects of variable as opposed to fixed delays on preference in a self-control paradigm (choice between larger, more delayed and smaller, less delayed reinforcers). Nonindependent concurrent variable-interval schedules were used to measure choice. When delays to the larger, more delayed reinforcers were variable as opposed to fixed, the subjects showed an increased preference for that alternative (the self-control alternative). A series of regressions revealed that the hyperbolic decay model and incentive theory provided poor fits to the data, but a modified version of the generalized matching law provided an adequate fit. Together, consistent with a general prediction made by discounting models, the data supported the conclusion that variable delays can increase self-control. However, specific discounting models were not able to explain the present data well.

Entities:  

Year:  1994        PMID: 16812737      PMCID: PMC1334365          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  21 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Violations of transitivity: Implications for a theory of contextual choice.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for mixed versus constant delays of reinforcement: Effect of probability of the short, mixed delay.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Delay of reinforcers in a concurrent-chain schedule: An extension of the hyperbolic-decay model.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice between rewards differing in amount and delay: Toward a choice model of self control.

Authors:  L Green; M Snyderman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Constant versus variable delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  B H PUBOLS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1962-02

10.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Designing interventions that include delayed reinforcement: implications of recent laboratory research.

Authors:  R Stromer; J J McComas; R A Rehfeldt
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

2.  Independence of reinforcement delay and magnitude in concurrent chains.

Authors:  R C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The hybrid delay task: can capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) sustain a delay after an initial choice to do so?

Authors:  Fabio Paglieri; Valentina Focaroli; Jessica Bramlett; Valeria Tierno; Joseph M McIntyre; Elsa Addessi; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) can wait, when they choose to: a study with the hybrid delay task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Fabio Paglieri; Joseph M McIntyre; Elsa Addessi; William D Hopkins
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Cuttlefish exert self-control in a delay of gratification task.

Authors:  Alexandra K Schnell; Markus Boeckle; Micaela Rivera; Nicola S Clayton; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.349

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.