Literature DB >> 14489099

Constant versus variable delay of reinforcement.

B H PUBOLS.   

Abstract

Keywords:  LEARNING

Mesh:

Year:  1962        PMID: 14489099     DOI: 10.1037/h0048566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Benjamin P Kowal; Eric S Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Preference for mixed versus constant delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  R A Cicerone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The effect of variable delays on self-control.

Authors:  J J Chelonis; G King; A W Logue; H Tobin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Observing ben wyckoff: from basic research to programmed instruction and social issues.

Authors:  Rogelio Escobar; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2011

6.  The probability of small schedule values and preference for random-interval schedules.

Authors:  Michelle Ennis Soreth; Philip N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A general framework for understanding the effects of variability and interruptions on foraging behaviour.

Authors:  J M McNamara; A I Houston
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.774

8.  Pigeons' preference for variable-interval water reinforcement under widely varied water budgets.

Authors:  D A Case; P Nichols; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.