Literature DB >> 14130099

APERIODICITY AS A FACTOR IN CHOICE.

R J HERRNSTEIN.   

Abstract

Four pigeons were trained to peck at either of two response-keys. Pecks at either key occasionally produced a secondary reinforcer, in the presence of which further pecks occasionally produced food, the primary reinforcer. All pigeons showed a consistent preference for variable (as compared to fixed) interval schedules of primary reinforcement.

Keywords:  BIRDS; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); EXPERIMENTAL LAB STUDY; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY)

Mesh：

Year:  1964        PMID： 14130099      PMCID： PMC1404317          DOI： 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN： 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  2 in total

1.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Potency of Conditioned Reinforcers Based on Food and on Food and Punishment.

Authors:  G S Reynolds
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728
  2 in total
  59 in total

1.  Comparing preference and resistance to change in constant- and variable-duration schedule components.

Authors:  R C Grace; J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Evidence against a constant-difference effect in concurrent-chains schedules.

Authors:  James E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of primary reinforcement on pigeons' initial-link responding under a concurrent chains schedule with nondifferntial terminal links.

Authors:  B O Ploog
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Changing behavior within session: cyclicity and perseverance produced by varying the minimum ratio of a variable-ratio schedule.

Authors:  M E Andrzejewski; D P Field; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Benjamin P Kowal; Eric S Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Escalation research: providing new frontiers for applying behavior analysis to organizational behavior.

Authors:  S M Goltz
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2000

7.  Exploring preferences for variable delays over fixed delays to high-value food rewards as a model of food-seeking behaviours in humans.

Authors:  Laura-Jean G Stokes; Anna Davies; Paul Lattimore; Catharine Winstanley; Robert D Rogers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Pigeons' choices between fixed-interval and random-interval schedules: utility of variability?

Authors:  Matthew E Andrzejewski; Claudia D Cardinal; Douglas P Field; Barbara A Flannery; Michael Johnson; Kathleen Bailey; Philip N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?

Authors:  Randolph C Grace; Orn Bragason
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Serial conditioning as a function of stimulus, response, and temporal dependencies.

Authors:  W L Palya; R A Bevins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.