Literature DB >> 16811316

Some factors controlling preference between fixed-ratio and variable-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

J A Sherman, J R Thomas.   

Abstract

A multiple schedule of food reinforcement for key-pecking was arranged which consisted of nine fixed-ratios, each of which operated in the presence of a different stimulus. Pigeons could complete a given fixed-ratio within the multiple schedule or, by pecking a second key, could switch from the fixed-ratio schedule to a variable-ratio schedule consisting of the same nine ratios. Stable switching behavior was established which did not maximize simple probability or rate of reinforcement. Instead, the subjects showed a stable preference for the variable-ratio schedule of food reinforcement. Increasing the number of responses required to switch, and removing the occasions on which reinforcement was delivered after a single response in the variable schedule, decreased the number of switches to the variable schedule. Periods of delay interposed between a completed switch and the availability of reinforcement after one response in the variable schedule also decreased switching to the variable schedule, particularly at long delay intervals.

Year:  1968        PMID: 16811316      PMCID: PMC1338622          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  An experimental outline for building and exploring multi-operant behavior repertoires.

Authors:  J D FINDLEY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Secondary reinforcement and number of primary reinforcements.

Authors:  E Fantino; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of required rates of responding upon choice.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Preference and switching under ratio contingencies with humans.

Authors:  H Weiner
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1966-02
  8 in total
  15 in total

1.  The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Benjamin P Kowal; Eric S Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Fixed-ratio and variable-ratio schedules of brief stimuli in second-order schedules of matching to sample.

Authors:  M C Boren
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference for mixed versus constant delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  R A Cicerone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Concurrent ratio schedules: Fixed vs. variable response requirements.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Preference for mixed versus constant delays of reinforcement: Effect of probability of the short, mixed delay.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Steady-state performance on fixed-, mixed-, and random-ratio schedules.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Induced attack during multiple fixed-ratio, variable-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  F M Webbe; J Deweese; E F Malagodi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice for aperiodic versus periodic ratio schedules: A comparison of concurrent and concurrent-chain procedures.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Preference between variable-ratio and fixed-ratio schedules: local and extended relations.

Authors:  D P Field; F Tonneau; W Ahearn; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Risky choice in pigeons and humans: a cross-species comparison.

Authors:  Carla H Lagorio; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.