Literature DB >> 16811837

Discriminative stimulus location as a determinant of positive and negative behavioral contrast in the pigeon.

B Schwartz.   

Abstract

Four pigeons were exposed to a series of two-component multiple schedules of reinforcement that ordinarily yield positive and negative behavioral contrast. The stimuli that signalled the component schedules were sometimes located on the response key and sometimes off. Positive behavioral contrast was observed only when the stimuli were on the key. Negative contrast was observed independent of stimulus location. These data suggest that positive and negative contrast may be causally unrelated, and support an account of contrast in terms of the summation of key pecks that are separately controlled by response-reinforcer and stimulus-reinforcer dependencies.

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811837      PMCID: PMC1333337          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  19 in total

1.  Some limitations on behavioral contrast and induction during successive discrimination.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A comparison of variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  G E Zuriff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Some determinants of inhibitory stimulus control.

Authors:  R G Weisman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.

Authors:  E Gamzu; B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The role of the response-reinforcer contingency in negative automaintenance.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Associative factors underlying the pigeon's key pecking in auto-shaping procedures.

Authors:  E R Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Aversive properties of the negative stimulus in a successive discrimination.

Authors:  M Rilling; H R Askew; J E Ahlskog; T J Kramer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  29 in total

1.  Three versions of the additive theories of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; R H Ettinger; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral contrast for key pecking as a function of component duration when only one component varies.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; C L Melville
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Negative behavioral contrast on multiple treadle-press schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimulus control of respondent and operant key pecking: A single key procedure.

Authors:  H Marcucella
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Real-time detection of orientation during negative behavioral contrast with key pecking and a turning response.

Authors:  K Manabe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Contrast and undermatching as a function of reinforcer duration and quality during multiple schedules.

Authors:  R H Ettinger; F K McSweeney; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Behavioral contrast of time allocation.

Authors:  A Bouzas; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Determinants of contrast in the signal-key procedure: Evidence against additivity theory.

Authors:  B A Williams; N Heyneman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation in a discrete-trials IRT>t procedure.

Authors:  M G Wessells
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.