Literature DB >> 16811654

The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.

E Gamzu, B Schwartz.   

Abstract

Three naive pigeons were exposed to a series of two-component multiple schedules of response-independent food presentation. The component schedules were sometimes identical (non-differential procedures) and sometimes different (differential procedures). High rates of key pecking were maintained in all the differential procedures, and pecking decreased substantially in non-differential procedures, even when the frequency of food presentation in non-differential procedures was higher than in differential procedures. It is suggested that the high rates of key pecking were maintained not by adventitious response-reinforcer contingencies, but by differential contingencies between the stimulus (keylight) and food. The role of such contingencies in the phenomenon of behavioral contrast is discussed.

Year:  1973        PMID: 16811654      PMCID: PMC1334052          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  The discrimination of contingent from noncontingent reinforcement.

Authors:  J B APPEL; R H HISS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1962-02

2.  Secondary reinforcement in rats as a function of information value and reliability of the stimulus.

Authors:  M D EGGER; N E MILLER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-08

3.  A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior.

Authors:  D M BRETHOWER; G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Some effects of response-independent positive reinforcement on maintained operant behavior.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; W H MORSE
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1957-10

6.  Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Some effects of response independent reinforcers in multiple schedules.

Authors:  K A Lattal; G C Maxey
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A demonstration of auto-shaping with monkeys.

Authors:  M Sidman; F G Fletcher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  70 in total

1.  Economic and biological influences on key pecking and treadle pressing in pigeons.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Daniel D Holt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Selected publication trends in JEAB: Implications for the vitality of the experimental analysis of behavior.

Authors:  Bryan K Saville; L Kimberly Epting; William Buskist
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2002

3.  Behavioral contrast: Pavlovian effects and anticipatory contrast.

Authors:  A D Hassin-Herman; N S Hemmes; B L Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of varying the percentage of key illuminations paired with food in a positive automaintenance procedure.

Authors:  F A Gonzalez
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Studies of operant and reflexive key pecks in the pigeon.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Elicited responding to signals for reinforcement: the effects of overall versus local changes in reinforcement probability.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Three versions of the additive theories of behavioral contrast.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; R H Ettinger; W D Norman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The role of elicited responding in behavioral contrast.

Authors:  K Keller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules: the relationship between component duration and responding.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J Schrot
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.