Literature DB >> 13986428

Some limitations on behavioral contrast and induction during successive discrimination.

G S REYNOLDS.   

Abstract

A pigeon's rate of pecking on a red key, reinforced at a constant frequency, may be changed by increasing or decreasing the frequency of reinforcement of pecking on a successively presented green key. The changes in the rate of pecking on red, called interactions, are of two types: contrast, in which the changes in the rates of pecking on the two colors are in opposite directions; and, induction, in which the changes in the rates are in the same direction. In previous data, a change in the frequency of reinforcement associated with the green key produced a corresponding change in the rate of pecking the green key and an opposite change (contrast) in the rate of pecking on the red key. The present data suggest that the magnitude of contrast is very small if pecking on the red key is reinforced at a high enough frequency (about 40 reinforcements per hr in the present experiment). Also, given that interactions occur, induction rather than contrast may result from small changes in a low frequency of reinforcement associated with green.

Keywords:  BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING

Mesh:

Year:  1963        PMID: 13986428      PMCID: PMC1404215          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior.

Authors:  D M BRETHOWER; G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Generalization gradients around stimuli associated with different reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  N GUTTMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Relativity of response rate and reinforcement frequency in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Rate of response during operant discrimination.

Authors:  M H SMITH; W J HOY
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-10

7.  An analysis of interactions in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Behavioral contrast with fixed interval and low-rate reinforcement.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS; A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  46 in total

1.  RELATIVE RATE OF RESPONSE AND RELATIVE MAGNITUDE OF REINFORCEMENT IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES.

Authors:  S SHETTLEWORTH; J A NEVIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Response strength in extreme multiple schedules.

Authors:  Anthony P McLean; Randolph C Grace; John A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A comparison of variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  G E Zuriff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Response strength in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Schedule-induced licking during multiple schedules.

Authors:  Y F Jacquet
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The effect of the blackout method on acquisition and generalization.

Authors:  D G Wildemann; J G Holland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Behavioral interactions in multiple variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  R D Spealman; L R Gollub
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Positive interaction (induction) in multiple variable-interval, differential-reinforcement-of-high-rate schedules.

Authors:  N S Hemmes; D A Eckerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules: the relationship between component duration and responding.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J Schrot
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.