Literature DB >> 16811367

Some determinants of inhibitory stimulus control.

R G Weisman.   

Abstract

Interspersed reinforcement and extinction during discrimination learning generate a U-shaped gradient of inhibition about the stimulus correlated with extinction. The present work showed that extinction is not a necessary determinant of inhibitory stimulus control. In Exp. I, a reduction in the rate of reinforcement, through a shift from a multiple variable-interval 1-min variable-interval 1-min schedule to a multiple variable-interval 1-min variable-interval 5-min schedule, resulted in a post-discrimination line orientation gradient of inhibition about the stimulus correlated with the variable-interval 5-min schedule. In Exp. II, the rates of reinforcement, correlated with a pair of stimuli, were held constant during a shift from a multiple variable-interval 1-min variable-interval 1-min schedule to a multiple variable-interval 1-min differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule. Inhibitory stimulus control about the stimulus correlated with the differential reinforcement of low rate was obtained. In both experiments, a reduction in the rate of responding during one stimulus and behavioral contrast during the other stimulus preceded the observation of inhibitory stimulus control.

Year:  1969        PMID: 16811367      PMCID: PMC1338606          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  A further study of stimulus generalization following three-stimulus discrimination training.

Authors:  D R THOMAS; J L WILLIAMS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Discrimination learning with and without "errors".

Authors:  H S TERRACE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Generalization gradients around stimuli associated with different reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  N GUTTMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

4.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

5.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Two types of behavioral contrast in discrimination learning.

Authors:  T M Bloomfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A peak shift on a line-tilt continuum.

Authors:  T M Bloomfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Discrimination learning and inhibition.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-12-30       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  21 in total

1.  Some effects of response-independent reinforcement on auditory generalization gradients.

Authors:  R C Huff; J E Sherman; M Cohn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stimulus duration as a measure of stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Honig; I L Beale
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The effect of shock intensity upon responding under a multiple-avoidance schedule.

Authors:  R W Powell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Response rate, reinforcement frequency, and behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G V Thomas; G N Cameron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Honig; P J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Behavioral contrast with timeout, blackout, or extinction as the negative condition.

Authors:  S Sadowsky
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Delayed reinforcement in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  D M Wilkie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Stimulus generalization and delay of reinforcement during one component of a multiple schedule.

Authors:  R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.