Literature DB >> 16812247

Three versions of the additive theories of behavioral contrast.

F K McSweeney, R H Ettinger, W D Norman.   

Abstract

The additive theories of behavioral contrast state that contrast will occur only when two types of responses interact during multiple schedules. Three more specific versions of the theories may be defined according to how they distinguish these two types of responses. A strong version physically distinguishes them. A second version distinguishes them according to the theoretical processes which control them. A weak version distinguishes them on the basis of the environmental relations which control them. Only the weak version of the theories is currently testable. The weak theory should be tested by establishing each of the two environmental relations independently and then combining them to assess their effect on behavior. Because this test is not usually performed, many of the results which have been taken to support or contradict the additive theories are actually ambiguous.

Year:  1981        PMID: 16812247      PMCID: PMC1333075          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  50 in total

1.  The effects of different component response requirements in multiple and concurrent schedules.

Authors:  M Davison; A Ferguson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Negative behavioral contrast on multiple treadle-press schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral contrast as differential time allocation.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral aftereffects of reinforcement and its omission as a function of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  C Jensen; D Fallon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and local behavioral contrast.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Associative interaction: joint control of key pecking by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relationships.

Authors:  G Woodruff; N Conner; E Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Contrast effects in multiple fixed-interval reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  N K Innis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Stimulus- and response-reinforcer contingencies in autoshaping, operant, classical, and omission training procedures in rats.

Authors:  G W Atnip
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Two types of pigeon key pecking: suppression of long- but not short-duration key pecks by duration-dependent shock.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Contrast and autoshaping in multiple schedules varying reinforcer rate and duration.

Authors:  B E Hamilton; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Positive behavioral contrast when pigeons press treadles during multiple schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Jeab at 50: coevolution of research and technology.

Authors:  Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Facets of Pavlovian and operant extinction.

Authors:  K Matthew Lattal; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 1.777

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.