Literature DB >> 16812133

The effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation in a discrete-trials IRT>t procedure.

M G Wessells.   

Abstract

The correlation between a keylight and food in a discrete-trials, interresponse-time-greater-than 6-sec (IRT>6-sec) procedure was varied by manipulating the rate of response-independent food presentation in the intertrial interval. When the correlation was positive, the rates of pecking in the IRT>6-sec condition were high and food was obtained on only about 5% of the trials. Likewise, responding was maintained at a high rate in yoked birds that received the same presentations of the light and food as the birds in the IRT>6-sec condition. When the rate of reinforcement between trials was equated to or made greater than the rate of reinforcement within trials, the response rate decreased for all birds, and those decreases were considerably larger for the yoked birds. However, the percentage of trials in which reinforced responses occurred under the IRT>6-sec procedure did not increase substantially when the light and food were either uncorrelated or negatively correlated. The percentage of trials in which a reinforcer was obtained increased when the keylight was left on continuously and the discriminative stimulus was not presented on the key. The results show that the stimulus-reinforcer correlation affects responding in the discrete-trials IRT>6-sec procedure, but that the effects of the stimulus-reinforcer correlation vary as a function of whether reinforcement is response-dependent or response-independent. The differences between the effects of response-independent and response-dependent pairings and nonpairings of the light and food are best accounted for in terms of differences in the control of responding by background stimuli.

Year:  1979        PMID: 16812133      PMCID: PMC1332861          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  21 in total

1.  The role of elicited responding in behavioral contrast.

Authors:  K Keller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Collateral responding during differential reinforcement of low rates.

Authors:  G E Zuriff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Discriminative stimulus location as a determinant of positive and negative behavioral contrast in the pigeon.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A comparison of the key-peck and treadle-press operants in the pigeon: differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  W K Richardson; D B Clark
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Interactions in multiple schedules: the role of the stimulus-reinforcer contingency.

Authors:  R D Spealman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcement contingencies maintaining collateral responding under a DRL schedule.

Authors:  D E McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Some implications of a relational principle of reinforcement.

Authors:  J W Donahoe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response.

Authors:  E Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Further observations on overt "mediating" behavior and the discrimination of time.

Authors:  V G Laties; B Weiss; A B Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.