Literature DB >> 16811661

Associative factors underlying the pigeon's key pecking in auto-shaping procedures.

E R Gamzu, D R Williams.   

Abstract

Key pecking in pigeons can be engendered by associating response-independent food presentations with illumination of a key. Specific pairings of key and food are not necessary for this phenomenon. Differential positive association between key and food (defined in terms of relative densities of reinforcement), however, is necessary and sufficient to produce and maintain key pecking. Thus, the occurrence of key pecking in auto-shaping can be considered to depend on associative processes similar to classical conditioning. Consequently, auto-shaped pecking can be virtually eliminated by the addition of food presentations in the intertrial interval, thus removing the association between key and food. Initial exposure to random reinforcement, or reinforcement only in the absence of the key, results in lower rates of pecking in subsequent auto-shaping procedures.

Year:  1973        PMID: 16811661      PMCID: PMC1334074          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  Secondary reinforcement in rats as a function of information value and reliability of the stimulus.

Authors:  M D EGGER; N E MILLER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-08

2.  The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation.

Authors:  E Gamzu; B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A demonstration of auto-shaping with monkeys.

Authors:  M Sidman; F G Fletcher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-08

7.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response.

Authors:  E Gamzu; D R Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total
  41 in total

1.  The principal components of response strength.

Authors:  P R Killeen; S S Hall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  The role of US signal value in contingency, drug conditioning, and learned helplessness.

Authors:  M J Goddard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

3.  The learning curve: implications of a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Charles R Gallistel; Stephen Fairhurst; Peter Balsam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Generalization peak shift for autoshaped and operant key pecks.

Authors:  S J Weiss; R D Weissman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Effects of varying the percentage of key illuminations paired with food in a positive automaintenance procedure.

Authors:  F A Gonzalez
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Studies of operant and reflexive key pecks in the pigeon.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The role of elicited responding in behavioral contrast.

Authors:  K Keller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Rate and temporal pattern of key pecking under autoshaping and omission schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J D Deich; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Lever-contact responses in rats: automaintenance with and without a negative response-reinforcer dependency.

Authors:  M Stiers; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Stimulus control of respondent and operant key pecking: A single key procedure.

Authors:  H Marcucella
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.