Literature DB >> 16811697

Effects of two procedures for varying information transmission on observing responses.

S B Kendall.   

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted with pigeons to examine the effects of procedures that varied information transmission on observing responses. The basic procedure for Experiment I was one in which a trial terminated in either non-contingent reinforcement or timeout. Pecking during a trial produced either green (positive) or red (negative) keylights. If no pecking occurred no differential stimuli appeared. The probability of positive trials was either 0.25, 0.50, or 0.75. Observing response rates and relative frequencies of occurrence were highest when the probability of positive trials was 0.25 and lowest at 0.75. In Experiment II, a modified chain procedure was used in which responding produced either red or green lights. Reinforcement or timeout followed light onset by 15 sec. The correlation between the stimuli and the event at the end of the trial (reinforcement or timeout) was varied. Reinforcement followed green 100%, 90%, 70%, or 50% of the time that green occurred. Since the overall probability of reinforcement remained at 0.50, reinforcement followed red in either 0%, 10%, 30%, or 50% of the time that it occurred. The rate of responses that produced these stimuli varied as a function of the correlation. The greater the probability of reinforcement after green, the higher the response rate.

Year:  1973        PMID: 16811697      PMCID: PMC1334104          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF OBSERVING RESPONSES IN A MIXED FI-FR SCHEDULE.

Authors:  S B KENDALL
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Secondary reinforcement in rats as a function of information value and reliability of the stimulus.

Authors:  M D EGGER; N E MILLER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-08

4.  Observing responses in pigeons.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; W C RIDDLE; L COOK
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice between two-component chained and tandem schedules.

Authors:  J W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Observing responses and informative stimuli.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R O Clements
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The role of information in the emission of observing responses: a test of two hypotheses.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R O Clements
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Value of knowing when reinforcement is due.

Authors:  G Bower; J McLean; J Meacham
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-10
  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Preference for intermittent reinforcement.

Authors:  S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Separating the effects of salience and disparity on the rate of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; C A Bowe; D L Dout; L T Martin; K L Mueller; J D Workman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Context, observing behavior, and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  R J Auge
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and multiple reinforcers.

Authors:  J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Average uncertainty as a determinant of observing behavior.

Authors:  J C McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Enhancement of conditioned reinforcement by uncertainty.

Authors:  S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Variable shock-free times with informative and uniformative stimuli.

Authors:  L M Lewin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 8.  Quantitative analyses of observing and attending.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Conditioned reinforcement value and resistance to change.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Timeout from concurrent schedules.

Authors:  R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.