Literature DB >> 16812348

Separating the effects of salience and disparity on the rate of observing.

J A Dinsmoor, C A Bowe, D L Dout, L T Martin, K L Mueller, J D Workman.   

Abstract

Pigeons producing deliveries of grain on a mixed variable-interval, extinction schedule by pecking a center key could also produce discriminative stimuli on concurrent variable-interval schedules by pecking the left or right observing key. The stimuli produced by each observing key were varied independently. In the first experiment, the negative discriminative stimulus was at the far end of the spectrum from the key illumination accompanying the mixed schedule and from the positive discriminative stimulus. When the magnitude of the difference between the latter two stimuli (salience) was varied, more pecks occurred on the observing key producing the larger of the two differences than on the key producing the smaller difference. In the second experiment, the stimulus accompanying the mixed schedule was at the far end of the spectrum, and the magnitude of the difference between the two discriminative stimuli (disparity) was varied. The proportion of pecks occurring on each observing key shifted systematically in the direction of the key producing the larger difference. The salience of the discriminative stimuli and their disparity each has an independent influence on the frequency of observing when the other is controlled, but the effect of the salience appears to be the more substantial.

Year:  1983        PMID: 16812348      PMCID: PMC1347936          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  The pigeon's perception of saturation.

Authors:  P M Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stimulus emphasis and all-or-none learning in concept identification.

Authors:  T R TRABASSO
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-04

3.  Cold exposure and heat reinforced operant behavior.

Authors:  P L CARLTON; R A MARKS
Journal:  Science       Date:  1958-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The role of observing responses in discrimination learning.

Authors:  L B WYCKOFF
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1952-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Effects of two procedures for varying information transmission on observing responses.

Authors:  S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Behavioral contrast and inhibitory stimulus control as related to extended training.

Authors:  W Selekman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; M P Browne; C E Lawrence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus.

Authors:  D E Mulvaney; J A Dinsmoor; A R Jwaideh; L H Hughes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Observing responses and uncertainty reduction.

Authors:  J Steiner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  The acquisition of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; K L Mueller; L T Martin; C A Bowe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Stimulus control: part II.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1995

Review 2.  The role of observing and attention in establishing stimulus control.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Stimulus Control Research and Practice: Considerations of Stimulus Disparity and Salience for Discrimination Training.

Authors:  Mary E Halbur; R Kyle Caldwell; Tiffany Kodak
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-01-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.