Literature DB >> 16811882

Enhancement of conditioned reinforcement by uncertainty.

S B Kendall.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained in three conditions. In the baseline condition, the birds responded on a fixed-interval schedule with the response key white. When the interval was completed, the key turned either red or green for a delay interval that was terminated by a grain presentation dependent on no key pecks during the final 2 sec. In the uncertainty condition, no grain was presented at the end of the delay periods when the key was red. In the certainty condition, the white light appeared only on occasions when pecking would turn the key green and produce food. Otherwise, the key was illuminated red throughout the total time period. The highest response rate in white occurred in the uncertainty condition, the next highest in the certainty condition, and the lowest in baseline. The results suggest that uncertainty facilitated responding, although uncertainty is not a necessary condition for conditioned reinforcement.

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811882      PMCID: PMC1333432          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  An experimental outline for building and exploring multi-operant behavior repertoires.

Authors:  J D FINDLEY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of two procedures for varying information transmission on observing responses.

Authors:  S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference for intermittent reinforcement.

Authors:  S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Observing responses and informative stimuli.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R O Clements
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Behavioral contrast in chained schedules.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R A Gay
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A study of some relations among aperiodic reinforcement, discrimination training and secondary reinforcement.

Authors:  J M NOTTERMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1951-03

8.  Reinforcement omission on fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  J E Staddon; N K Innis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  The contribution of an added counter to a fixed-ratio schedule.

Authors:  C B Ferster; D B Peele
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Matching-to-sample in pigeons: in the absence of sample memory, sample frequency is a better predictor of comparison choice than the probability of reinforcement for comparison choice.

Authors:  Kelly A DiGan; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.

Authors:  R Dunn; M L Spetch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.

Authors:  M L Spetch; T W Belke; R C Barnet; R Dunn; W D Pierce
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.