Literature DB >> 16811803

Average uncertainty as a determinant of observing behavior.

J C McMillan.   

Abstract

After discrimination training on a multiple variable-interval extinction schedule of food reinforcement, pigeons were placed on the uncued or mixed version of the same schedule and allowed to make an optional "observing response" that converted the uncued schedule to the corresponding cued schedule by providing a 20-sec exposure to the appropriate discriminative stimulus. The schedule consisted of one hundred 40-sec components, and the probability that any one of them would be a variable-interval component was systematically varied between 0.00 and 1.00. The results showed that the amount of observing behavior was an inverted "U" function of the probability of the variable-interval component. Few observing responses occurred at probabilities of 0.00 or 1.00, and maximum responding occurred at a value less than 0.50.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811803      PMCID: PMC1333281          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  Observing responses in pigeons.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; W C RIDDLE; L COOK
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stimulus-producing responses in chimpanzees.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement.

Authors:  W F PROKASY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-04

4.  The role of observing responses in discrimination learning.

Authors:  L B WYCKOFF
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1952-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Effects of two procedures for varying information transmission on observing responses.

Authors:  S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; M P Browne; C E Lawrence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The role of information in the emission of observing responses: a test of two hypotheses.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R O Clements
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Observing responses and uncertainty reduction.

Authors:  J Steiner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 2.143

  8 in total
  13 in total

1.  Sample-duration effects on pigeons' delayed matching as a function of predictability of duration.

Authors:  P J Urcuioli; T B DeMarse; K M Lionello
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Observing behavior: effects of rate and magnitude of primary reinforcement.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The delay-reduction hypothesis of conditioned reinforcement and punishment: Observing behavior.

Authors:  D A Case; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Uncertainty reduction, conditioned reinforcement, and observing.

Authors:  E Fantino; J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for multiple versus mixed schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Alsop; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The effect of negative stimulus presentations on observing-response rates.

Authors:  K L Mueller; J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Variable shock-free times with informative and uniformative stimuli.

Authors:  L M Lewin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Quantitative analyses of observing and attending.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Combinations of response-dependent and response-independent schedule-correlated stimulus presentation in an observing procedure.

Authors:  Anthony DeFulio; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.