Literature DB >> 16708257

Electrical excitation of the acoustically sensitive auditory nerve: single-fiber responses to electric pulse trains.

Charles A Miller1, Paul J Abbas, Barbara K Robinson, Kirill V Nourski, Fawen Zhang, Fuh-Cherng Jeng.   

Abstract

Nearly all studies on auditory-nerve responses to electric stimuli have been conducted using chemically deafened animals so as to more realistically model the implanted human ear that has typically been profoundly deaf. However, clinical criteria for implantation have recently been relaxed. Ears with "residual" acoustic sensitivity are now being implanted, calling for the systematic evaluation of auditory-nerve responses to electric stimuli as well as combined electric and acoustic stimuli in acoustically sensitive ears. This article presents a systematic investigation of single-fiber responses to electric stimuli in acoustically sensitive ears. Responses to 250 pulse/s electric pulse trains were collected from 18 cats. Properties such as threshold, dynamic range, and jitter were found to differ from those of deaf ears. Other types of fiber activity observed in acoustically sensitive ears (i.e., spontaneous activity and electrophonic responses) were found to alter the temporal coding of electric stimuli. The electrophonic response, which was shown to greatly change the information encoded by spike intervals, also exhibited fast adaptation relative to that observed in the "direct" response to electric stimuli. More complex responses, such as "buildup" (increased responsiveness to successive pulses) and "bursting" (alternating periods of responsiveness and unresponsiveness) were observed. Our findings suggest that bursting is a response unique to sustained electric stimulation in ears with functional hair cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16708257      PMCID: PMC2504607          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-006-0036-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  30 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure.

Authors:  E Javel; R K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  The neuronal response to electrical constant-amplitude pulse train stimulation: evoked compound action potential recordings.

Authors:  A J Matsuoka; P J Abbas; J T Rubinstein; C A Miller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. I. Physiological measurement of membrane characteristics in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L A Cartee; C van den Honert; C C Finley; R L Miller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Response properties of the refractory auditory nerve fiber.

Authors:  C A Miller; P J Abbas; B K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-09

5.  Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Kirill V Nourski; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory response to intracochlear electric stimuli following furosemide treatment.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Paul J Abbas; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Kirill V Nourski; Fuh-Cherng Jeng; Bruce A Abkes; John M Nichols
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials evoked by electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Paul J Abbas; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Auditory nerve responses to monophasic and biphasic electric stimuli.

Authors:  C A Miller; B K Robinson; J T Rubinstein; P J Abbas; C L Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Combining acoustic and electrical hearing.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  20 in total

1.  Examining the auditory nerve fiber response to high rate cochlear implant stimulation: chronic sensorineural hearing loss and facilitation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; David J Sly; James B Fallon; Mark W White; Robert K Shepherd; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Tonotopic distribution of short-term adaptation properties in the cochlear nerve of normal and acoustically overexposed chicks.

Authors:  Mark A Crumling; James C Saunders
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-01-03

3.  A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Leon F Heffer; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Auditory nerve fiber responses to combined acoustic and electric stimulation.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Kirill V Nourski; Fawen Zhang; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-02-10

5.  Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Stephen Y Kang; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Gina L Su; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-10

6.  Selective Neuronal Activation by Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Primate.

Authors:  Luke A Johnson; Charles C Della Santina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Neural Processing of Acoustic and Electric Interaural Time Differences in Normal-Hearing Gerbils.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Optogenetic stimulation of the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Victor H Hernandez; Anna Gehrt; Kirsten Reuter; Zhizi Jing; Marcus Jeschke; Alejandro Mendoza Schulz; Gerhard Hoch; Matthias Bartels; Gerhard Vogt; Carolyn W Garnham; Hiromu Yawo; Yugo Fukazawa; George J Augustine; Ernst Bamberg; Sebastian Kügler; Tim Salditt; Livia de Hoz; Nicola Strenzke; Tobias Moser
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Loss of Afferent Vestibular Input Produces Central Adaptation and Increased Gain of Vestibular Prosthetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher Phillips; Sarah J Shepherd; Amy Nowack; Kaibao Nie; Chris R S Kaneko; Jay T Rubinstein; Leo Ling; James O Phillips
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-05

10.  Acoustic-electric interactions in the guinea pig auditory nerve: simultaneous and forward masking of the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Paul J Abbas; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.