Literature DB >> 10675635

Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure.

E Javel1, R K Shepherd.   

Abstract

Latency, temporal dispersion and input-output characteristics of auditory nerve fiber responses to electrical pulse trains in normal and chronically deafened cat ears were classified and tentatively associated with sites where activity is initiated. Spikes occurred in one or more of four discrete time ranges whose endpoints overlapped partially. A responses had latencies <0.44 ms, exhibited asymptotic temporal dispersion of 8-12 micros and possessed an average dynamic range of 1.2 dB for 200 pulses/s (pps) pulse trains. They likely originated from central processes of spiral ganglion cells. B(1) and B(2) responses (0.45-0.9 ms, 25-40 micros, 1.9 dB) likely stemmed from activity at myelinated and unmyelinated peripheral processes, respectively. C100 micros) likely originated from direct stimulation of inner hair cells, and D8 dB) arose from propagating traveling waves possibly caused by electrically induced motion of outer hair cells. C and D responses were recorded only in acoustically responsive ears. Mean latencies of spikes in all time ranges usually decreased with intensity, and activity at two or even three discrete latencies was often observed in the same spike train. Latency shifts from one discrete time range to another often occurred as intensity increased. Some shifts could be attributed to responses to the opposite-polarity phase of the biphasic pulse. In these cases, temporal dispersion and dynamic range were approximately equal for activity at each latency. A second type of latency shift was also often observed, in which responses at each latency exhibited dissimilar temporal dispersion and dynamic range. This behavior was attributed to a centralward shift in the spike initiation site and it occurred for monophasic as well as biphasic signals. Several fibers exhibited dual latency activity with a 40-90 micros time difference between response peaks. This may have stemmed from spike initiation at nodes on either side of the cell body. Increasing the stimulus pulse rate to 800-1000 pps produced small increases in temporal dispersion and proportionate increases in asymptotic discharge rate and dynamic range, but thresholds did not improve and slopes of rate-intensity functions (in spikes/s/dB) did not change. Responses to high-rate stimuli also exhibited discrete latency increases when discharge rates exceeded 300-400 spikes/s. Spike by spike latencies in these cases depended strongly on the discharge history. Implications for high-rate speech processing strategies are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10675635     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00186-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  39 in total

1.  Discharge properties of identified cochlear nucleus neurons and auditory nerve fibers in response to repetitive electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Alexander L Babalian; David K Ryugo; Eric M Rouiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Electrical excitation of the acoustically sensitive auditory nerve: single-fiber responses to electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Kirill V Nourski; Fawen Zhang; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-16

7.  Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons?

Authors:  Anne Coco; Stephanie B Epp; James B Fallon; Jin Xu; Rodney E Millard; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Spontaneous activity of auditory-nerve fibers: insights into stochastic processes at ribbon synapses.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Dexter R F Irvine; Mel Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Differential responses to high-frequency electrical stimulation in ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Perry Twyford; Changsi Cai; Shelley Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 10.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.