Literature DB >> 17200911

Tonotopic distribution of short-term adaptation properties in the cochlear nerve of normal and acoustically overexposed chicks.

Mark A Crumling1, James C Saunders.   

Abstract

Cochlear nerve adaptation is thought to result, at least partially, from the depletion of neurotransmitter stores in hair cells. Recently, neurotransmitter vesicle pools have been identified in chick tall hair cells that might play a role in adaptation. In order to understand better the relationship between adaptation and neurotransmitter release dynamics, short-term adaptation was characterized by using peristimulus time histograms of single-unit activity in the chick cochlear nerve. The adaptation function resulting from 100-ms pure tone stimuli presented at the characteristic frequency, +20 dB relative to threshold, was well described as a single exponential decay process with an average time constant of 18.6+/-0.8 ms (mean+/-SEM). The number of spikes contributed by the adapting part of the response increased tonotopically for characteristic frequencies up to approximately 0.8 kHz. Comparison of the adaptation data with known physiological and anatomical hair cell properties suggests that depletion of the readily releasable pool is the basis of short-term adaptation in the chick. With this idea in mind, short-term adaptation was used as a proxy for assessing tall hair cell synaptic function following intense acoustic stimulation. After 48 h of exposure to an intense pure tone, the time constant of short-term adaptation was unaltered, whereas the number of spikes in the adapting component was increased at characteristic frequencies at and above the exposure frequency. These data suggest that the rate of readily releasable pool emptying is unaltered, but the neurotransmitter content of the pool is increased, by exposure to intense sound. The results imply that an increase in readily releasable pool size might be a compensatory mechanism ensuring the strength of the hair cell afferent synapse in the face of ongoing acoustic stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17200911      PMCID: PMC2538420          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-006-0061-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  32 in total

1.  Transmitter release at the hair cell ribbon synapse.

Authors:  Elisabeth Glowatzki; Paul A Fuchs
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Spontaneous synaptic potentials from afferent terminals in the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  J H Siegel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  A diffusion model of the transient response of the cochlear inner hair cell synapse.

Authors:  L A Westerman; R L Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A two-stage nonlinear cochlear model possesses automatic gain control.

Authors:  C D Geisler; S Greenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Developmental stability of the tonotopic organization of the chick's basilar papilla.

Authors:  G A Manley; J Brix; A Kaiser
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Conservation of adapting components in auditory-nerve responses.

Authors:  L A Westerman; R L Smith
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Rapid and short-term adaptation in auditory nerve responses.

Authors:  L A Westerman; R L Smith
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Adaptation in auditory-nerve fibers: a revised model.

Authors:  R L Smith; M L Brachman
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  C W Parkins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Spectral and temporal response patterns of single units in the chinchilla dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  J A Kaltenbach; J C Saunders
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.330

View more
  8 in total

1.  Adaptation reduces spike-count reliability, but not spike-timing precision, of auditory nerve responses.

Authors:  Michael Avissar; Adam C Furman; James C Saunders; Thomas D Parsons
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Adaptive responses of peripheral lateral line nerve fibres to sinusoidal wave stimuli.

Authors:  Joachim Mogdans; Christina Müller; Maren Frings; Ferdinand Raap
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Evaluating adaptation and olivocochlear efferent feedback as potential explanations of psychophysical overshoot.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Michael G Heinz; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-26

4.  Auditory brainstem responses predict auditory nerve fiber thresholds and frequency selectivity in hearing impaired chinchillas.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Sushrut Kale; Ryan E Scheidt; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Noise-induced hearing loss alters the temporal dynamics of auditory-nerve responses.

Authors:  Ryan E Scheidt; Sushrut Kale; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Calcium-dependent inactivation of calcium channels in cochlear hair cells of the chicken.

Authors:  Seunghwan Lee; Olga Briklin; Hakim Hiel; Paul Fuchs
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Specificity of the Human Frequency Following Response for Carrier and Modulation Frequency Assessed Using Adaptation.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Alexandra Krugliak; Christopher J Plack; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-11

8.  Age-related hearing loss is associated with alterations in temporal envelope processing in different neural generators along the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Ehsan Darestani Farahani; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.086

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.