Literature DB >> 14599695

Auditory response to intracochlear electric stimuli following furosemide treatment.

Ning Hu1, Paul J Abbas, Charles A Miller, Barbara K Robinson, Kirill V Nourski, Fuh-Cherng Jeng, Bruce A Abkes, John M Nichols.   

Abstract

The influence of functional hair cells on electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve is an important issue as individuals with significant residual hearing are now cochlear implant candidates. Previous work has shown that chemical deafening during the course of acute experiments changes the auditory nerve's responses to electrical stimulation [Third Quarterly Progress Report, NIH contract N01-DC-9-2106 (2000), Final Report, NIH Contract N01-DC-9-2106 (2002)]. This study extended that work by investigating the changes and subsequent recovery following furosemide injections which reversibly impair hair-cell function [Hear. Res. (1980) 79-89; Hear. Res. 14 (1984) 305-314, J. Physiol. 347 (1984) 685-696; Hear. Res. 71 (1993) 202-207]. Acoustic sensitivity of guinea pig subjects was repeatedly monitored with the click-evoked compound action potential. Responses to single biphasic electric pulses and biphasic electric pulse trains delivered by a monopolar intracochlear electrode were also repeatedly assessed using the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP). Our measures demonstrated a clear relationship between the state of hair-cell function and ECAP responses, as changes in the latter coincided with the loss or recovery of acoustic sensitivity. ECAP growth functions demonstrated increased slope and increased maximum (saturation) amplitude. Both trends were reversible and followed approximately the time course of post-furosemide hearing recovery. Additional changes were observed using electric pulse-train stimulation: (1) the magnitude of ECAP amplitude alternation (observed in response to successive stimulus pulses) increased, (2) the degree of ECAP adaptation (measured 80-100 ms after pulse-train onset) increased, and (3) the degree of refractoriness (measured by the ratio of ECAP amplitudes to the second and first pulses) tended to increase. All these trends are consistent with the hypothesis that functional hair cells desynchronize the population of auditory nerve fibers, thereby changing the electrically evoked responses. Viable hair cells may therefore provide positive effects on auditory response to electric stimuli delivered to implant patients with residual hearing, as they may enhance the random activity of the stimulated nerve.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14599695     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00261-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  12 in total

1.  Detection of pulse trains in the electrically stimulated cochlea: effects of cochlear health.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Deborah J Colesa; Sheena Hembrador; Stephen Y Kang; John C Middlebrooks; Yehoash Raphael; Gina L Su
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Electrical excitation of the acoustically sensitive auditory nerve: single-fiber responses to electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Kirill V Nourski; Fawen Zhang; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-16

3.  Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Rose A Burkholder-Juhasz; Teresa A Zwolan; Li Xu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effects of deafening and cochlear implantation procedures on postimplantation psychophysical electrical detection thresholds.

Authors:  Gina L Su; Deborah J Colesa; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Stephen Y Kang; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Gina L Su; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-10

6.  Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to spatial selectivity.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Sara A Bowling; Deborah J Colesa; Soha N Garadat; Yehoash Raphael; Seiji B Shibata; Stefan B Strahl; Gina L Su; Ning Zhou
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Intracochlear electrical stimulation suppresses apoptotic signaling in rat spiral ganglion neurons after deafening in vivo.

Authors:  Jonathan C Kopelovich; Alain P Cagaanan; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Steven H Green
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Acoustic-electric interactions in the guinea pig auditory nerve: simultaneous and forward masking of the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Paul J Abbas; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Binaural electric-acoustic interactions recorded from the inferior colliculus of Guinea pigs: the effect of masking observed in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Heil Noh; Dong-Hee Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.