Literature DB >> 15811706

Effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials evoked by electric pulse trains.

Kirill V Nourski1, Paul J Abbas, Charles A Miller, Barbara K Robinson, Fuh-Cherng Jeng.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of acoustic noise on the auditory nerve compound action potentials in response to electric pulse trains. Subjects were adult guinea pigs, implanted with a minimally invasive electrode to preserve acoustic sensitivity. Electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAP) were recorded from the auditory nerve trunk in response to electric pulse trains both during and after the presentation of acoustic white noise. Simultaneously presented acoustic noise produced a decrease in ECAP amplitude. The effect of the acoustic masker on the electric probe was greatest at the onset of the acoustic stimulus and it was followed by a partial recovery of the ECAP amplitude. Following cessation of the acoustic noise, ECAP amplitude recovered over a period of approximately 100-200 ms. The effects of the acoustic noise were more prominent at lower electric pulse rates (interpulse intervals of 3 ms and higher). At higher pulse rates, the ECAP adaptation to the electric pulse train alone was larger and the acoustic noise, when presented, produced little additional effect. The observed effects of noise on ECAP were the greatest at high electric stimulus levels and, for a particular electric stimulus level, at high acoustic noise levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15811706     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Viral D Tejani; Rachel A Scheperle; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Electrical excitation of the acoustically sensitive auditory nerve: single-fiber responses to electric pulse trains.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Kirill V Nourski; Fawen Zhang; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-16

3.  Acoustic-electric interactions in the guinea pig auditory nerve: simultaneous and forward masking of the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Paul J Abbas; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Design and fabrication of multichannel cochlear implants for animal research.

Authors:  Stephen J Rebscher; Alexander M Hetherington; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 5.  Electroacoustic stimulation: now and into the future.

Authors:  S Irving; L Gillespie; R Richardson; D Rowe; J B Fallon; A K Wise
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Interaction Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Influences Speech Perception in Ipsilateral EAS Users.

Authors:  Marina Imsiecke; Benjamin Krüger; Andreas Büchner; Thomas Lenarz; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Cochlear Implant Stimulation of a Hearing Ear Generates Separate Electrophonic and Electroneural Responses.

Authors:  Mika Sato; Peter Baumhoff; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.