Literature DB >> 16697096

A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision making.

Kathryn E Flynn1, Maureen A Smith, David Vanness.   

Abstract

Classifying patients as "active" or "passive" with regard to healthcare decision making is misleading, since patients have different desires for different components of the decision-making process. Distinguishing patients' desired roles is an essential step towards promoting care that respects and responds to individual patients' preferences. We included items on the 2004 Wisconsin Longitudinal Study mail survey measuring preferences for four components of the decision-making process: physician knowledge of patient medical history, physician disclosure of treatment choices, discussion of treatment choices, and selection of treatment choice. We characterized preference types for 5199 older adults using cluster analysis. Ninety-six percent of respondents are represented by four preference types, all of which prefer maximal information exchange with physicians. Fifty-seven percent of respondents wanted to retain personal control over important medical decisions ("autonomists"). Among the autonomists, 81% preferred to discuss treatment choices with their physician. Thirty-nine percent of respondents wanted their physician to make important medical decisions ("delegators"). Among the delegators, 41% preferred to discuss treatment choices. Female gender, higher educational attainment, better self-rated health, fewer prescription medications, and having a shorter duration at a usual place of care predicted a significantly higher probability of the most active involvement in discussing and selecting treatment choices. The overwhelming majority of older adults want to be given treatment options and have their physician know everything about their medical history; however, there are substantial differences in how they want to be involved in discussing and selecting treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16697096      PMCID: PMC1637042          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  26 in total

1.  What patients really want.

Authors:  M Gerteis; S Edgman-Levitan; J D Walker; D M Stoke; P D Cleary; T L Delbanco
Journal:  Health Manage Q       Date:  1993

2.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature.

Authors:  L M Ong; J C de Haes; A M Hoos; F B Lammes
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Preferences for involvement in medical decision-making: situational and demographic influences.

Authors:  S C Thompson; J S Pitts; L Schwankovsky
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1993-12-31

6.  What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?

Authors:  R B Deber; N Kraetschmer; J Irvine
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-07-08

7.  Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians' participatory decision-making style. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  S H Kaplan; B Gandek; S Greenfield; W Rogers; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; N F Boyd; P Warde; L Stolbach; J E Till
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

9.  Patient desire for information and decision making in health care decisions: the Autonomy Preference Index and the Health Opinion Survey.

Authors:  R F Nease; W B Brooks
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?

Authors:  L F Degner; J A Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  60 in total

1.  Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Jeff A Sloan; Pamela J Atherton; Tenbroeck Smith; Thomas F Hack; Mashele M Huschka; Teresa A Rummans; Matthew M Clark; Brent Diekmann; Lesley F Degner
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  A typology of sick-listed claimants to improve communication skills for social insurance physicians during medical disability assessment interviews.

Authors:  H J van Rijssen; A J M Schellart; J R Anema; A J van der Beek
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

3.  Patient perceptions of carrying their own health information: approaches towards responsibility and playing an active role in their own health - implications for a patient-held health file.

Authors:  Rowena Forsyth; Carol A Maddock; Rick A M Iedema; Marissa Lassere
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  'I'm happy that I can still walk'--Participation of the elderly in home care as a specific group with specific needs and wishes.

Authors:  Charlotte Bagchus; Christine Dedding; Joske F G Bunders
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  End-of-Life Treatment Preferences Among Older Adults: An Assessment of Psychosocial Influences.

Authors:  Deborah Carr; Sara M Moorman
Journal:  Sociol Forum (Randolph N J)       Date:  2009-12-01

6.  Cohort profile: Wisconsin longitudinal study (WLS).

Authors:  Pamela Herd; Deborah Carr; Carol Roan
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Patients' perceptions of safety if interpersonal continuity of care were to be disrupted.

Authors:  Nancy Pandhi; Jessica Schumacher; Kathryn E Flynn; Maureen Smith
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Patient age influences perceptions about health care communication.

Authors:  Jennifer E DeVoe; Lorraine S Wallace; George E Fryer
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Older adults newly diagnosed with symptomatic myeloma and treatment decision making.

Authors:  Joseph D Tariman; Ardith Doorenbos; Karen G Schepp; Seema Singhal; Donna L Berry
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Qualitative approaches to understanding patient preferences.

Authors:  Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.