Literature DB >> 24969250

Older adults newly diagnosed with symptomatic myeloma and treatment decision making.

Joseph D Tariman1, Ardith Doorenbos2, Karen G Schepp2, Seema Singhal3, Donna L Berry4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To describe the preferences for participation in decision making of older adult patients newly diagnosed with symptomatic myeloma and to explore the association between sociodemographic variables and decisional role preferences.
DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional design.
SETTING: Participants' homes and two large academic cancer centers in Seattle, WA, and Chicago, IL. SAMPLE: A convenience sample of 20 older adults (60 years of age and older) with symptomatic myeloma diagnosed within the past six months.
METHODS: The Control Preferences Scale was administered followed by an in-person, one-time, semistructured interview. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Role preferences for participation in treatment decision making, age, gender, race, work status, personal relationship status, education, and income.
FINDINGS: Fifty-five percent of the participants preferred a shared role with the physician and 40% preferred to make the decisions after seriously considering the opinion of their physicians. Only one participant preferred to leave the decision to the doctor, as long as the doctor considered the patient's treatment preferences.
CONCLUSIONS: The study findings indicate that older adults newly diagnosed with myeloma want to participate in treatment decision making. Oncology nurses must respect the patient's desired role preference and oncology clinicians must listen to the patient and allow him or her to be autonomous in making treatment decisions. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses and other oncology clinicians can elicit a patient's preferred level of participation in treatment decision making. Oncology nurses can make sure patients receive disease- and treatment-related information, encourage them to express their decisional role preference to the physician, develop a culture of mutual respect and value their desire for autonomy for treatment decision making, acknowledge that the right to make a treatment choice belongs to the patient, and provide support during treatment decision making throughout the care continuum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; decisional role preferences; multiple myeloma; patient education

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24969250      PMCID: PMC4074776          DOI: 10.1188/14.ONF.411-419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  31 in total

1.  The 2nd annual EBRI/Commonwealth Fund Consumerism in Health Care Survey, 2006: early experience with high-deductible and consumer-driven health plans.

Authors:  Paul Fronstin; Sara R Collins
Journal:  EBRI Issue Brief       Date:  2006-12

2.  Consumerism and health care. Will the traditional patient-physician relationship survive?

Authors:  A H Rosenstein
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  The decision-making experience among women diagnosed with stage I and II breast cancer.

Authors:  Brenda Sabo; Nathalie St-Jacques; Daniel Rayson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision making.

Authors:  Kathryn E Flynn; Maureen A Smith; David Vanness
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Decision-making and breast cancer clinical trials: how experience challenges attitudes.

Authors:  Julien Mancini; Jean Genève; Florence Dalenc; Dominique Genre; Alain Monnier; Pierre Kerbrat; Rémy Largillier; Daniel Serin; Maria Rios; Henri Roché; Marta Jimenez; Carole Tarpin; Claire Julian Reynier
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  A randomized trial of a computer-tailored decision aid to improve prostate cancer screening decisions: results from the Take the Wheel trial.

Authors:  Jennifer D Allen; Megan K D Othus; Alton Hart; Laura Tom; Yi Li; Donna Berry; Deborah Bowen
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Incidence of multiple myeloma in Olmsted County, Minnesota: Trend over 6 decades.

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; Terry M Therneau; S Vincent Rajkumar; Dirk R Larson; Matthew F Plevak; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Susie H M Kim; Ephraim S Casper; David W Kissane; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision.

Authors:  Nancy K Janz; Patricia A Wren; Laurel A Copeland; Julie C Lowery; Sherry L Goldfarb; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  A targeted decision aid for the elderly to decide whether to undergo colorectal cancer screening: development and results of an uncontrolled trial.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Carol E Golin; Chris DeLeon; Jennifer M Griffith; Jena Ivey; Lyndal Trevena; Michael Pignone
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cancer patients' control preferences in decision making and associations with patient-reported outcomes: a prospective study in an outpatient cancer center.

Authors:  Markus Schuler; Jan Schildmann; Freya Trautmann; Leopold Hentschel; Beate Hornemann; Anke Rentsch; Gerhard Ehninger; Jochen Schmitt
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Factors influencing supportive care needs of multiple myeloma patients treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yoo-Rin Cho; Yang-Sook Yoo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Assessing the predictive power of psychological empowerment and health literacy for older patients' participation in health care: a cross-sectional population-based study.

Authors:  Gabriele Sak; Fabia Rothenfluh; Peter J Schulz
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  A prospective observational study to assess clinical decision-making, prognosis, quality of life and satisfaction with care in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: the CLARITY study protocol.

Authors:  Fabio Efficace; Mario Boccadoro; Antonio Palumbo; Maria Teresa Petrucci; Francesco Cottone; Laura Cannella; Elena Zamagni; Pasquale Niscola; Charalampia Kyriakou; Tommaso Caravita; Massimo Offidani; Franco Mandelli; Michele Cavo
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Socio-economic differences in patient participation behaviours in doctor-patient interactions-A systematic mapping review of the literature.

Authors:  Sarah Allen; Simon N Rogers; Rebecca V Harris
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Characterizing the Patient Journey in Multiple Myeloma: Qualitative Review.

Authors:  Matthew Lyall; Rebecca Crawford; Timothy Bell; Carla Mamolo; Alexander Neuhof; Courtney Levy; Anne Heyes
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2022-09-22

7.  Patient, Caregiver, and Nurse Preferences for Treatments for Bone Metastases from Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Yi Qian; Jorge Arellano; A Brett Hauber; Ateesha F Mohamed; Juan Marcos Gonzalez; Guy Hechmati; Francesca Gatta; Stacey Harrelson; Cynthia Campbell-Baird
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.883

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.