Literature DB >> 1432023

Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?

L F Degner1, J A Sloan.   

Abstract

Two surveys were conducted to determine what roles people actually want to assume in selecting cancer treatments. 436 newly diagnosed cancer patients and 482 members of the general public participated. Preferences were elicited using two card sort procedures, each of which described five potential roles in decision making. Findings suggested that the impact of being diagnosed with a life-threatening illness may influence preferences to participate. The majority (59%) of patients wanted physicians to make treatment decisions on their behalf, but 64% of the public thought they would want to select their own treatment if they developed cancer. Most patients (51%) and members of the public (46%) wanted their physician and family to share responsibility for decision making if they were too ill to participate. Sociodemographic variables accounted for only 15% of variance in preferences. These variables are not particularly useful in making predictions about which groups want more or less active roles in medical decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship; Winnipeg

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1432023     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90110-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  264 in total

1.  Editorial: special conference issue.

Authors:  Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Tim Whelan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  A role for the sick role. Patient preferences regarding information and participation in clinical decision-making.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; G M Kiebert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Arthritis patients' motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement.

Authors:  Ingrid Nota; Constance H C Drossaert; Erik Taal; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  End-of-life decision making: a qualitative study of elderly individuals.

Authors:  K E Rosenfeld; N S Wenger; M Kagawa-Singer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Medical tests: women's reported and preferred decision-making roles and preferences for information on benefits, side-effects and false results.

Authors:  Heather M Davey; Alexandra L Barratt; Elizabeth Davey; Phyllis N Butow; Sally Redman; Nehmat Houssami; Glenn P Salkeld
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Intentional and unintentional nonadherence: a study of decision making.

Authors:  Abigail L Wroe
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2002-08

Review 7.  Informed consent for clinical treatment.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Allan V Prochazka; Aaron S Fink
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  A grounded explanation of why women present with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Nur Aishah Taib; Cheng Har Yip; Wah Yun Low
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jennifer M Knopf; Richard W Hornung; Gail B Slap; Robert F DeVellis; Maria T Britto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Characteristics Associated With Preferences for Parent-Centered Decision Making in Neonatal Intensive Care.

Authors:  Elliott Mark Weiss; Dawei Xie; Noah Cook; Katherine Coughlin; Steven Joffe
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 16.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.