Literature DB >> 21057589

End-of-Life Treatment Preferences Among Older Adults: An Assessment of Psychosocial Influences.

Deborah Carr1, Sara M Moorman.   

Abstract

We explore the content and correlates of older adults' end-of-life treatment preferences in two hypothetical terminal illness scenarios: severe physical pain with no cognitive impairment, and severe cognitive impairment with no physical pain. For each scenario, we assess whether participants would reject life-prolonging treatment, accept treatment, or do not know their preferences. Using data from the 2004 wave of the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (N = 5,106), we estimate multinomial logistic regression models to evaluate whether treatment preferences are associated with direct experience with end-of-life issues, personal beliefs, health, and sociodemographic characteristics. Persons who have made formal end-of-life preparations, persons with no religious affiliation, mainline Protestants, and persons who are pessimistic about their own life expectancy are more likely to reject treatment in both scenarios. Women and persons who witnessed the painful death of a loved one are more likely to reject treatment in the cognitive impairment scenario only. Consistent with rational choice perspectives, our results suggest that individuals prefer treatments that they perceive to have highly probable desirable consequences for both self and family.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21057589      PMCID: PMC2971558          DOI: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01135.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Forum (Randolph N J)        ISSN: 0884-8971


  46 in total

1.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Factors affecting long-term-care residents' decision-making processes as they formulate advance directives.

Authors:  Heather C Lambert; Mary Ann McColl; Julie Gilbert; Jiahui Wong; Gale Murray; Samuel E D Shortt
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2005-10

3.  Many seeking one final say on end of life.

Authors:  John Schwartz; James Estrin
Journal:  N Y Times Web       Date:  2005-06-17

4.  Family conflict at the end of life: lessons learned in a model program for vulnerable older adults.

Authors:  Betty J Kramer; Amy Z Boelk; Casey Auer
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Validation of preferences for life-sustaining treatment: implications for advance care planning.

Authors:  D L Patrick; R A Pearlman; H E Starks; K C Cain; W G Cole; R F Uhlmann
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Stability of patient preferences regarding life-sustaining treatments.

Authors:  M A Everhart; R A Pearlman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Dying with lung cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: insights from SUPPORT. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.

Authors:  M T Claessens; J Lynn; Z Zhong; N A Desbiens; R S Phillips; A W Wu; F E Harrell; A F Connors
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision making.

Authors:  Kathryn E Flynn; Maureen A Smith; David Vanness
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers.

Authors:  K E Steinhauser; N A Christakis; E C Clipp; M McNeilly; L McIntyre; J A Tulsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Trauma death: views of the public and trauma professionals on death and dying from injuries.

Authors:  Lenworth M Jacobs; Karyl Burns; Barbara Bennett Jacobs
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  Cohort profile: Wisconsin longitudinal study (WLS).

Authors:  Pamela Herd; Deborah Carr; Carol Roan
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  How long is long enough, and have we done everything we should?--Ethics of calling codes.

Authors:  Primi-Ashley Ranola; Raina M Merchant; Sarah M Perman; Abigail M Khan; David Gaieski; Arthur L Caplan; James N Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Understanding End-of-Life Preferences: Predicting Life-Prolonging Treatment Preferences Among Community-Dwelling Older Americans.

Authors:  Allison B Brenner; Lesli E Skolarus; Chithra R Perumalswami; James F Burke
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Development of a Dementia-Focused End-of-Life Planning Tool: The LEAD Guide (Life-Planning in Early Alzheimer's and Dementia).

Authors:  Kara Dassel; Rebecca Utz; Katherine Supiano; Sara Bybee; Eli Iacob
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2019-08-02

5.  Associations of end-of-life preferences and trust in institutions with public support for assisted suicide: evidence from nationally representative survey data of older adults in Switzerland.

Authors:  Sarah Vilpert; Carmen Borrat-Besson; Gian Domenico Borasio; Jürgen Maurer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Awareness and attitudes towards advance care planning in primary care: role of demographic, socioeconomic and religiosity factors in a cross-sectional Lebanese study.

Authors:  Georges Assaf; Sarah Jawhar; Kamal Wahab; Rita El Hachem; Tanjeev Kaur; Maria Tanielian; Lea Feghali; Adina Zeki Al Hazzouri; Martine Elbejjani
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Advance Care Planning: Contemporary Issues and Future Directions.

Authors:  Deborah Carr; Elizabeth A Luth
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2017-08-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.