Literature DB >> 8678709

What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?

R B Deber1, N Kraetschmer, J Irvine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although current ideology suggests patients should be active participants in decision making about their care, the literature suggests that patients wish to be informed but not involved.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that most patients want their physicians to take the responsibility for problem solving (PS, identifying the one right answer), but that many want to be involved in decision-making (DM, selecting the most desired bundle of outcomes) tasks.
METHODS: Survey responses from 300 patients undergoing angiogram at a Toronto, Ontario, hospital were analyzed (response rate, 72%). Survey items included scales to measure desire for information and participation, including Autonomy Preference Index, the Krantz Health Opinion Survey, and the Deber-Kraetschmer Problem-Solving Decision-Making Scale measured on a scale from, 1 (doctor only) to 5 (patient only).
RESULTS: Patients had a relatively high desire for information. On the Problem-Solving Decision-Making Scale, they overwhelmingly wished the PS tasks to be performed by or shared with the physician (98.4% of the 12 PS scores are between 1 and 3), but wanted to be involved in DM (78% of the 6 DM scores are between 3 and 5). Preference for handing over control to the physician was significantly greater for the vignette involving potential mortality (chest pain) than for the vignettes involving mainly morbidity (urinary problems) or quality of life (fertility).
CONCLUSIONS: Although patients do not wish to be involved in PS tasks, few wish to hand over DM control to their physician. These findings suggest 2 major roles for clinicians--assisting patients in PS to structure choices and supporting them in making often difficult decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship; Toronto

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8678709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  160 in total

1.  Shared decision making and non-directiveness in genetic counselling.

Authors:  G Elwyn; J Gray; A Clarke
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Arthritis patients' motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement.

Authors:  Ingrid Nota; Constance H C Drossaert; Erik Taal; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Perceptions of benefit and risk of patients undergoing first-time elective percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Authors:  E S Holmboe; D A Fiellin; E Cusanelli; M Remetz; H M Krumholz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health.

Authors:  E Vance Wilson; Nancy K Lankton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Concordance of couples' prostate cancer screening recommendations from a decision analysis.

Authors:  Scott B Cantor; Robert J Volk; Murray D Krahn; Alvah R Cass; Jawaria Gilani; Susan C Weller; Stephen J Spann
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Heather Campbell; Ann Russell; Jennifer Henderson; Anne Matheson; Blake Melnick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jennifer M Knopf; Richard W Hornung; Gail B Slap; Robert F DeVellis; Maria T Britto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Mutual influence in shared decision making: a collaborative study of patients and physicians.

Authors:  Beth A Lown; William D Clark; Janice L Hanson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  General Practitioners' Empathy and Health Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study of Consultations in Areas of High and Low Deprivation.

Authors:  Stewart W Mercer; Maria Higgins; Annemieke M Bikker; Bridie Fitzpatrick; Alex McConnachie; Suzanne M Lloyd; Paul Little; Graham C M Watt
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Informing patients: a guide for providing patient health information.

Authors:  P C Tang; C Newcomb
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.