Literature DB >> 25250981

Patient-Perceived Pressure from Clinicians for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery: A Population-Based Survey of U.S. Women.

Judy Jou1, Katy B Kozhimannil1, Pamela Jo Johnson2, Carol Sakala3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patient-perceived pressure from clinicians for labor induction or cesarean delivery is significantly associated with having these procedures. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Listening to Mothers III, a nationally representative survey of women 18-45 years who delivered a singleton infant in a U.S. hospital July 2011-June 2012 (N = 2,400). STUDY
DESIGN: Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with perceived pressure and estimation of odds of induction and cesarean given perceived pressure. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Overall, 14.8 percent of respondents perceived pressure from a clinician for labor induction and 13.3 percent for cesarean delivery. Women who perceived pressure for labor induction had higher odds of induction overall (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.51; 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 2.5-5.0) and without medical reason (aOR: 2.13; 95 percent CI: 1.3-3.4) compared with women who did not perceive pressure. Those perceiving pressure for cesarean delivery had higher odds of cesarean overall (aOR: 5.17; 95 percent CI: 3.2-8.4), without medical reason (aOR: 6.13; 95 percent CI: 3.4-11.1), and unplanned cesarean (aOR: 6.70; 95 percent CI: 4.0-11.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-perceived pressure from clinicians significantly predicts labor induction and cesarean delivery. Efforts to reduce provider-patient miscommunication and minimize potentially unnecessary procedures may be warranted. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean delivery; labor induction; provider-patient communication; shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25250981      PMCID: PMC4545342          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  46 in total

1.  Indications for labor induction. Differences between university and community hospitals.

Authors:  L A Beebe; W F Rayburn; C M Beaty; K L Eberly; J R Stanley; L A Rayburn
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 0.142

2.  Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Fay Menacker; Marian Macdorman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Improving communication between health professionals and women in maternity care: a structured review.

Authors:  Rachel E Rowe; Jo Garcia; Alison J Macfarlane; Leslie L Davidson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  The impact of cesarean section on offspring overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  H-t Li; Y-b Zhou; J-m Liu
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  Patients' perspectives on the role of prepared childbirth education in decision making regarding elective labor induction.

Authors:  Kathleen Rice Simpson; Gloria Newman; Octavio R Chirino
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2010

6.  Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation.

Authors:  G Elwyn; A Edwards; P Kinnersley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Matching patients and practitioners based on beliefs about care: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Edward Krupat; John Hsu; Julie Irish; Julie A Schmittdiel; Joe Selby
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Health consequences of the increasing caesarean section rates.

Authors:  José M Belizán; Fernando Althabe; María Luisa Cafferata
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Caesarean delivery and risk of atopy and allergic disease: meta-analyses.

Authors:  P Bager; J Wohlfahrt; T Westergaard
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 5.018

10.  Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates.

Authors:  Linda J Heffner; Elena Elkin; Ruth C Fretts
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  9 in total

1.  Midwifery care and patient-provider communication in maternity decisions in the United States.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Laura B Attanasio; Y Tony Yang; Melissa D Avery; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-07

2.  Early Elective Delivery Disparities between Non-Hispanic Black and White Women after Statewide Policy Implementation.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Ifeoma Muoto; Blair G Darney; Aaron B Caughey; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2017-12-19

3.  Shifting Patterns in Cesarean Delivery Scheduling and Timing in Oregon before and after a Statewide Hard Stop Policy.

Authors:  Ifeoma Muoto; Blair G Darney; Bernard Lau; Yvonne W Cheng; Mark W Tomlinson; Duncan R Neilson; Steven A Friedman; Joanne Rogovoy; Aaron B Caughey; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-11-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Utilizing Datasets to Advance Perinatal Research.

Authors:  Julia C Phillippi; Jeremy L Neal; Nicole S Carlson; Frances M Biel; Jonathan M Snowden; Ellen L Tilden
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Sources of influence on pregnant women's preferred mode of delivery in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Authors:  Melissa Amyx; Luz Gibbons; Xu Xiong; Agustina Mazzoni; Fernando Althabe; Pierre Buekens; José M Belizán
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.689

6.  Empirical Investigation on the Characteristics and Perceived Value of Patients in Medical Treatment Seeking: In-Depth Research in Zhejiang Province of China.

Authors:  Hui Qian; Wu Lu; Daliang Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The Mothers on Respect (MOR) index: measuring quality, safety, and human rights in childbirth.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam; Kathrin Stoll; Nicholas Rubashkin; Kelsey Martin; Zoe Miller-Vedam; Hermine Hayes-Klein; Ganga Jolicoeur
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2017-01-19

8.  Factors Associated with Unplanned Primary Cesarean Birth: Secondary Analysis of the Listening to Mothers in California Survey.

Authors:  Carol Sakala; Candice Belanoff; Eugene R Declercq
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Maternal perceptions of the experience of attempted labor induction and medically elective inductions: analysis of survey results from listening to mothers in California.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Ronald Iverson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.