Literature DB >> 19564305

Delivery indications at late-preterm gestations and infant mortality rates in the United States.

Uma M Reddy1, Chia-Wen Ko, Tonse N K Raju, Marian Willinger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The rate of preterm births has been increasing in the United States, especially for births 34 to 36 weeks of gestation (late preterm), which now constitute 71% of all preterm births. The causes for these trends remain unclear. We characterized the delivery indications for late preterm births and their potential impact on neonatal and infant mortality rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the 2001 US Birth Cohort Linked birth/death files of 3 483 496 singleton births, we categorized delivery indications as follows: (1) maternal medical conditions; (2) obstetric complications; (3) major congenital anomalies; (4) isolated spontaneous labor: vaginal delivery without induction and without associated medical/obstetric factors; and (5) no recorded indication.
RESULTS: Of the 292 627 late-preterm births, the first 4 categories (those with indications and isolated spontaneous labor) accounted for 76.8%. The remaining 23.2% (67 909) were classified as deliveries with no recorded indication. Factors significantly increasing the chance of no recorded indication were older maternal age; non-Hispanic, white mother; >/=13 years of education; Southern, Midwestern, and Western region; multiparity; or previous infant with a >/=4000-g birth weight. The neonatal and infant mortality rates were significantly higher among deliveries with no recorded indication compared with deliveries secondary to isolated spontaneous labor but lower compared with deliveries with an obstetric indication or congenital anomaly.
CONCLUSIONS: A total of 23% of late preterm births had no recorded indication for delivery noted on birth certificates. Patient factors may be playing a role in these deliveries. It is concerning that these infants had higher mortality rates compared with those born after spontaneous labor at similar gestational ages. Given the excess risk of mortality, patients and providers need to discuss the risks of delivering a preterm infant in the absence of medical indications at 34 to 36 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19564305      PMCID: PMC2802276          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-3232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  23 in total

1.  Validation of birth certificate data. A study of women in New Jersey's HealthStart program.

Authors:  N E Reichman; E M Hade
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Volume and secretion rate of lung liquid in the final days of gestation and labour in the fetal sheep.

Authors:  R E Pfister; C A Ramsden; H L Neil; M A Kyriakides; P J Berger
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Comparative accuracy of clinical estimate versus menstrual gestational age in computerized birth certificates.

Authors:  G Mustafa; R J David
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Trends in preterm birth and perinatal mortality among singletons: United States, 1989 through 2000.

Authors:  Cande V Ananth; K S Joseph; Yinka Oyelese; Kitaw Demissie; Anthony M Vintzileos
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Variations in the accuracy of obstetric procedures and diagnoses on birth records in Washington State, 1989.

Authors:  K M Parrish; V L Holt; F A Connell; B Williams; J P LoGerfo
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  S A Dobie; L M Baldwin; R A Rosenblatt; M A Fordyce; C H Andrilla; L G Hart
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1998-09

7.  Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information.

Authors:  David L DiGiuseppe; David C Aron; Lorin Ranbom; Dwain L Harper; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2002-09

8.  Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records.

Authors:  J M Piper; E F Mitchel; M Snowden; C Hall; M Adams; P Taylor
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Long-term medical and social consequences of preterm birth.

Authors:  Dag Moster; Rolv Terje Lie; Trond Markestad
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Validation of birth certificate data in New York State.

Authors:  Patrick J Roohan; Raina E Josberger; Janice Acar; Poornima Dabir; Harry M Feder; Patricia J Gagliano
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2003-10
View more
  36 in total

1.  Association of Temporal Changes in Gestational Age With Perinatal Mortality in the United States, 2007-2015.

Authors:  Cande V Ananth; Robert L Goldenberg; Alexander M Friedman; Anthony M Vintzileos
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 16.193

2.  Association Between Temporal Changes in Neonatal Mortality and Spontaneous and Clinician-Initiated Deliveries in the United States, 2006-2013.

Authors:  Cande V Ananth; Alexander M Friedman; Robert L Goldenberg; Jason D Wright; Anthony M Vintzileos
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 16.193

3.  Attitudes and practices regarding late preterm birth among American obstetrician-gynecologists.

Authors:  Michael L Power; Zsakeba Henderson; Julia E Behler; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 4.  Epidemiology of late and moderate preterm birth.

Authors:  Carrie K Shapiro-Mendoza; Eve M Lackritz
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 5.  Preterm birth prevention: how well are we really doing? A review of the latest literature.

Authors:  Sarit Avraham; Fouad Azem; Daniel Seidman
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-06-07

6.  Fetal, neonatal and infant death and their relationship to best gestational age for delivery at term: is 39 weeks best for everyone?

Authors:  S A Myers; T P Waters; N V Dawson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Maternal and hospital characteristics of non-medically indicated deliveries prior to 39 weeks.

Authors:  Lindsay S Womack; William M Sappenfield; Cheryl L Clark; Washington C Hill; Robert W Yelverton; John S Curran; Linda A Detman; Vani R Bettegowda
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-10

8.  Prediction of neonatal respiratory morbidity by quantitative ultrasound lung texture analysis: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Montse Palacio; Elisenda Bonet-Carne; Teresa Cobo; Alvaro Perez-Moreno; Joan Sabrià; Jute Richter; Marian Kacerovsky; Bo Jacobsson; Raúl A García-Posada; Fernando Bugatto; Ramon Santisteve; Àngels Vives; Mauro Parra-Cordero; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; José Luis Bartha; Pilar Carretero-Lucena; Kai Lit Tan; Rogelio Cruz-Martínez; Minke Burke; Suseela Vavilala; Igor Iruretagoyena; Juan Luis Delgado; Mauro Schenone; Josep Vilanova; Francesc Botet; George S H Yeo; Jon Hyett; Jan Deprest; Roberto Romero; Eduard Gratacos
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Gestational weight gain and preterm birth: disparities in adolescent pregnancies.

Authors:  C L Woolfolk; L M Harper; L Flick; K Mathews; J J Chang
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Preventing preterm births: analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index.

Authors:  Hannah H Chang; Jim Larson; Hannah Blencowe; Catherine Y Spong; Christopher P Howson; Sarah Cairns-Smith; Eve M Lackritz; Shoo K Lee; Elizabeth Mason; Andrew C Serazin; Salimah Walani; Joe Leigh Simpson; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.