Literature DB >> 9736883

Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 and 1994.

K D Gregory1, S C Curtin, S M Taffel, F C Notzon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The percentages of cesarean deliveries attributable to specific indications (breech, dystocia, fetal distress, and elective repeat cesarean) were computed for 1985 and 1994.
METHODS: Data were derived from the 1985 and 1994 National Hospital Discharge Surveys.
RESULTS: Dystocia was the leading indication for cesarean delivery in both years. In comparison with 1985, cesareans performed in 1994 that were attributable to dystocia and breech presentation increased, those attributable to fetal distress did not change significantly, and elective repeat cesareans declined.
CONCLUSIONS: Studying indications for cesareans can be useful for hospitals, clinicians, and researchers in determining strategies to lower primary and repeat cesarean rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9736883      PMCID: PMC1509079          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.88.9.1384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  12 in total

1.  1991 summary: National Hospital Discharge Survey.

Authors:  E J Graves
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  1993-03-03

2.  1989 U.S. cesarean section rate steadies--VBAC rate rises to nearly one in five.

Authors:  S M Taffel; P J Placek; M Moien; C L Kosary
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.689

3.  Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise.

Authors:  S M Taffel; P J Placek; T Liss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Reducing cesarean sections at a teaching hospital.

Authors:  L Sanchez-Ramos; A M Kaunitz; H B Peterson; B Martinez-Schnell; R J Thompson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Analysis of repeat cesarean delivery indications: implications of heterogeneity.

Authors:  M L Hanley; J C Smulian; M F Lake; D A McLean; A M Vintzileos
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Cesarean birth: how to reduce the rate.

Authors:  R H Paul; D A Miller
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Decreasing the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: success without mandated clinical changes.

Authors:  D C Lagrew; M A Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Reducing cesarean births at a primarily private university hospital.

Authors:  M L Socol; P M Garcia; A M Peaceman; S L Dooley
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Repeat cesareans: how many are elective?

Authors:  K D Gregory; O A Henry; A J Gellens; C J Hobel; L D Platt
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Determinants of the increasing cesarean birth rate. Ontario data 1979 to 1982.

Authors:  G M Anderson; J Lomas
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  12 in total

1.  Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Fay Menacker; Marian Macdorman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Admission for Delivery in Women With Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Robert M Hayward; Elyse Foster; Zian H Tseng
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Primary and Repeat Cesarean Deliveries: A Population-based Study in the United States, 1979-2010.

Authors:  Cande V Ananth; Alexander M Friedman; Katherine M Keyes; Jessica A Lavery; Ava Hamilton; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Beta-2 adrenoceptor genotype and progress in term and late preterm active labor.

Authors:  Russell S Miller; Richard M Smiley; Danette Daniel; Chunhua Weng; Charles W Emala; Jean-Louis Blouin; Pamela D Flood
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Physiologic partograph to improve birth safety and outcomes among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Nancy K Lowe
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 1.538

6.  Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Alan T N Tita; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Yinglei Lai; Kenneth J Leveno; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Paul J Meis; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A Native American community with a 7% cesarean delivery rate: does case mix, ethnicity, or labor management explain the low rate?

Authors:  Lawrence Leeman; Rebecca Leeman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  The Effect of Clinical Chorioamnionitis on Cesarean Delivery in the United States.

Authors:  Kerry M Bommarito; Gilad A Gross; Denise M Willers; Victoria J Fraser; Margaret A Olsen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Outcome of deliveries in healthy but obese women: obesity and delivery outcome.

Authors:  Rebecka Kaplan-Sturk; Helena Åkerud; Helena Volgsten; Lena Hellström-Westas; Eva Wiberg-Itzel
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-02-06

10.  Primary cesarean delivery among parous women in the United States, 1990-2003.

Authors:  Jessie Ford; Jagteshwar Grewal; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Susan Meikle; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.