Literature DB >> 24509873

Exposure analysis methods impact associations between maternal physical activity and cesarean delivery.

Marit L Bovbjerg1, Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Kelly R Evenson, William Goodnight.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies report conflicting results regarding a possible association between maternal physical activity (PA) and cesarean delivery.
METHODS: Seven-day PA recalls were collected by telephone from pregnant women (n = 1205) from North Carolina, without prior cesarean, during 2 time windows: 17 to 22 weeks and 27 to 30 weeks completed gestation. PA was treated as a continuous, nonlinear variable in binomial regressions (log-link function); models controlled for primiparity, maternal contraindications to exercise, preeclampsia, pregravid BMI, and percent poverty. We examined both total PA and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) at each time. Outcomes data came from medical records.
RESULTS: The dose-response curves between PA or MVPA and cesarean risk at 17 to 22 weeks followed an inverse J-shape, but at 27 to 30 weeks the curves reversed and were J-shaped. However, only (total) PA at 27 to 30 weeks was strongly associated with cesarean risk; this association was attenuated when women reporting large volumes of PA (> 97.5 percentile) were excluded.
CONCLUSION: We did not find evidence of an association between physical activity and cesarean birth. We did, however, find evidence that associations between PA and risk of cesarean may be nonlinear and dependent on gestational age at time of exposure, limiting the accuracy of analyses that collapse maternal PA into categories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24509873      PMCID: PMC4590730          DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Act Health        ISSN: 1543-3080


  45 in total

1.  Effectiveness and safety of a structured swimming program in previously sedentary women during pregnancy.

Authors:  A M Lynch; S McDonald; E F Magann; S F Evans; P L Choy; B Dawson; B A Blanksby; J P Newnham
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2003-09

Review 2.  Physical activity for health: What kind? How much? How intense? On top of what?

Authors:  Kenneth E Powell; Amanda E Paluch; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Employment, exertion, and pregnancy outcome: assessment by kilocalories expended each day.

Authors:  E F Magann; S F Evans; J P Newnham
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Fay Menacker; Marian Macdorman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Effects of recommended levels of physical activity on pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Katarina Melzer; Yves Schutz; Nina Soehnchen; Veronique Othenin-Girard; Begoña Martinez de Tejada; Olivier Irion; Michel Boulvain; Bengt Kayser
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Susceptibility in utero and upon neonatal exposure.

Authors:  L Dencker; P Eriksson
Journal:  Food Addit Contam       Date:  1998

7.  Physical and psychological changes with vigorous exercise in sedentary primigravidae.

Authors:  S Marquez-Sterling; A C Perry; T A Kaplan; R A Halberstein; J F Signorile
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Births: preliminary data for 2011.

Authors:  Brady E Hamilton; Joyce A Martin; Stephanie J Ventura
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2012-10-03

9.  Training in pregnant women: effects on fetal development and birth.

Authors:  K R Kardel; T Kase
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Effects of aerobic and strength conditioning on pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  D C Hall; D A Kaufmann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.