Literature DB >> 8295319

Effect of changes in maternal age, parity, and birth weight distribution on primary cesarean delivery rates.

K M Parrish1, V L Holt, T R Easterling, F A Connell, J P LoGerfo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of maternal age on cesarean delivery risk and to quantify the impact of demographic changes since 1970 on primary cesarean delivery rates.
DESIGN: A cohort study.
SETTING: Nonfederal short-stay hospitals in Washington State. PARTICIPANTS: All women who delivered live singletons with linked birth certificate and hospital discharge data from 1987 through 1990. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal age-, birth weight-, and parity-specific primary cesarean delivery rates, Mantel-Haenszel relative risk estimates for primary cesarean delivery by 5-year age category stratified by parity, and direct standardization of 1987 through 1990 primary cesarean rates to 1970 Washington State maternal age, birth weight, and parity distribution.
RESULTS: Primary cesarean rates ranged from 3.2% for multiparous teenage women who delivered infants weighing 3500 g through 3999 g to 58.9% for primiparous women 40 years of age or older who delivered infants weighing 4000 g or more. After adjustment, the risk of cesarean delivery increased with each 5-year age increment among women 20 years of age or older. We estimated that if the maternal age, parity, and birth weight distribution from 1987 through 1990 were identical to what existed in 1970, Washington State's primary cesarean rate from 1987 through 1990 would have been 12.2%, compared with the observed rate of 14.8%.
CONCLUSION: The lower adjusted primary cesarean rate reflects the demographic changes in the childbearing population, which may be responsible for 18% of the 1987 through 1990 cesarean delivery rates. These findings suggest the importance of using maternal age-, birth weight-, and parity-specific primary cesarean delivery rates to compare populations and study temporal trends.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8295319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  29 in total

1.  Declining fertility and the use of cesarean delivery: evidence from a population-based study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ke-Zong M Ma; Edward C Norton; Shoou-Yih D Lee
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Changes in maternal characteristics in Nova Scotia, Canada from 1988 to 2001.

Authors:  Deshayne B Fell; K S Joseph; Linda Dodds; Alexander C Allen; Krista Jangaard; Michiel Van den Hof
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2005 May-Jun

3.  Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Fay Menacker; Marian Macdorman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Maternal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term.

Authors:  Shiliang Liu; Robert M Liston; K S Joseph; Maureen Heaman; Reg Sauve; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Analysis, assessment, and presentation of risk-adjusted statewide obstetrical care data: the StORQS II study in Washington State. Statewide Obstetrics Review and Quality System.

Authors:  R Holubkov; V L Holt; F A Connell; J P LoGerfo
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Adjusting cesarean delivery rates for case mix.

Authors:  E B Keeler; R E Park; R M Bell; D S Gifford; J Keesey
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Age at menarche and the risk of operative delivery.

Authors:  Hsu Phern Chong; J Frederik Frøen; Sylvia Richardson; Benoit Liquet; D Stephen Charnock-Jones; Gordon C S Smith
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-09-28

8.  Risk of severe maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery and the role of maternal age: a population-based propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Diane Korb; François Goffinet; Aurélien Seco; Sylvie Chevret; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  How to treat lumbar disc herniation in pregnancy? A systematic review on current standards.

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Fabrizio Russo; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Racial and ethnic differences in indication for primary cesarean delivery at term: experience at one U.S. Institution.

Authors:  Sierra Washington; Aaron B Caughey; Yvonne W Cheng; Allison S Bryant
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.689

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.