Literature DB >> 23586867

Midwifery care at a freestanding birth center: a safe and effective alternative to conventional maternity care.

Sarah Benatar1, A Bowen Garrett, Embry Howell, Ashley Palmer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of a midwifery model of care delivered in a freestanding birth center on maternal and infant outcomes when compared with conventional care. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Birth certificate data for women who gave birth in Washington D.C. and D.C. residents who gave birth in other jurisdictions. STUDY
DESIGN: Using propensity score modeling and instrumental variable analysis, we compare maternal and infant outcomes among women who receive prenatal care from birth center midwives and women who receive usual care. We match on observable characteristics available on the birth certificate, and we use distance to the birth center as an instrument. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: Birth certificate data from 2005 to 2008. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Women who receive birth center care are less likely to have a C-section, more likely to carry to term, and are more likely to deliver on a weekend, suggesting less intervention overall. While less consistent, findings also suggest improved infant outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: For women without medical complications who are able to be served in either setting, our findings suggest that midwife-directed prenatal and labor care results in equal or improved maternal and infant outcomes. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African American women; Midwives; cesarean section; low-income women; prenatal care

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23586867      PMCID: PMC3796112          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  32 in total

Review 1.  Midwifery care of poor and vulnerable women, 1925-2003.

Authors:  Jeanne Raisler; Holly Kennedy
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Fay Menacker; Marian Macdorman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium-, and high-income countries: an ecological study.

Authors:  Fernando Althabe; Claudio Sosa; José M Belizán; Luz Gibbons; Frederique Jacquerioz; Eduardo Bergel
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  Racial differences in birth outcomes: the role of general, pregnancy, and racism stress.

Authors:  Tyan Parker Dominguez; Christine Dunkel-Schetter; Laura M Glynn; Calvin Hobel; Curt A Sandman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Evaluation of a public-private certified nurse-midwife maternity program for indigent women.

Authors:  D Lenaway; T D Koepsell; T Vaughan; G van Belle; K Shy; F Cruz-Uribe
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Appropriate technology for birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter?

Authors:  R M Andersen
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1995-03

8.  Mortality benefit of transfer to level I versus level II trauma centers for head-injured patients.

Authors:  K John McConnell; Craig D Newgard; Richard J Mullins; Melanie Arthur; Jerris R Hedges
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Understanding risk, patient and provider preferences, and obstetrical decision making: approach to delivery after cesarean.

Authors:  Anjali J Kaimal; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.300

10.  Planned place of birth in New Zealand: does it affect mode of birth and intervention rates among low-risk women?

Authors:  Deborah Davis; Sally Baddock; Sally Pairman; Marion Hunter; Cheryl Benn; Don Wilson; Lesley Dixon; Peter Herbison
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.689

View more
  9 in total

1.  Potential Medicaid cost savings from maternity care based at a freestanding birth center.

Authors:  Embry Howell; Ashley Palmer; Sarah Benatar; Bowen Garrett
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2014-09-09

2.  Use of instrumental variables for endogenous treatment at the provider level.

Authors:  R Tamara Konetzka; Fan Yang; Rachel M Werner
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Race, Medicaid Coverage, and Equity in Maternal Morbidity.

Authors:  Clare C Brown; Caroline E Adams; Jennifer E Moore
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2021-01-21

4.  Preferences for birth center care in the Netherlands: an exploration of ethnic differences.

Authors:  Dominique Lescure; Sanneke Schepman; Ronald Batenburg; Therese A Wiegers; Ellen Verbakel
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Freestanding Midwife-Led Units: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Grażyna Bączek; Urszula Tataj-Puzyna; Dorota Sys; Barbara Baranowska
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2020-04-18

6.  Strong Start in birth centers: Socio-demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns.

Authors:  Jill Alliman; Susan R Stapleton; Jennifer Wright; Kate Bauer; Kate Slider; Diana Jolles
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.689

7.  Comparison of vaginal birth outcomes in midwifery-led versus physician-led setting: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Ingrida Poškienė; Giedrius Vanagas; Asta Kirkilytė; Rūta Jolanta Nadišauskienė
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2021-10-15

Review 8.  Is model of care associated with infant birth outcomes among vulnerable women? A scoping review of midwifery-led versus physician-led care.

Authors:  Daphne N McRae; Nazeem Muhajarine; Kathrin Stoll; Maureen Mayhew; Saraswathi Vedam; Deborah Mpofu; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2016-03-18

9.  Reduced prevalence of small-for-gestational-age and preterm birth for women of low socioeconomic position: a population-based cohort study comparing antenatal midwifery and physician models of care.

Authors:  Daphne N McRae; Patricia A Janssen; Saraswathi Vedam; Maureen Mayhew; Deborah Mpofu; Ulrich Teucher; Nazeem Muhajarine
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.