Literature DB >> 16558170

The Effects of the Swede-O, New Cross, and McDavid Ankle Braces and Adhesive Ankle Taping on Speed, Balance, Agility, and Vertical Jump.

D L Paris.   

Abstract

Scores from motor performance tests were compared using subjects with taped and untaped ankles. Previous studies have shown that taped ankle support may be detrimental in vertical and standing broad jumping performance. Conflicting data have been published on the effects of commercial ankle braces on various motor tasks. The performances of 18 elite soccer players in selected tests of speed, balance, agility, and vertical jumping were compared under conditions of untaped, nonelastic adhesive taped, Swede-O-braced, New Cross-braced, and McDavid-braced ankles. Vertical jump performance was significantly reduced when subjects wore New Cross braces. There were no significant differences in tests of speed, balance, and agility among any of the support conditions. Until now, nonelastic adhesive tape has been the preferred method of prophylactic ankle support. I conclude that certain commercial ankle braces may be used as a support alternative during selected activities.

Year:  1992        PMID: 16558170      PMCID: PMC1317255     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  8 in total

1.  The measurable support of the ankle joint by conventional methods of taping.

Authors:  G L RARICK; G BIGLEY; R KARST; R M MALINA
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1962-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices.

Authors:  R T Burks; B G Bean; R Marcus; H B Barker
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Systematic ankle stabilization and the effect on performance.

Authors:  J R Robinson; E C Frederick; L B Cooper
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Carotid artery injuries. Follow-up of fifteen patients treated in Viet Nam.

Authors:  R J Buchman; P A Thomas; B Park
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Retrospective comparison of taping and ankle stabilizers in preventing ankle injuries.

Authors:  G D Rovere; T J Clarke; C S Yates; K Burley
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  The effects of ankle guards and taping on joint motion before, during, and after a squash match.

Authors:  K H Myburgh; C L Vaughan; S K Isaacs
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  The measured effect of taping on combined foot and ankle motion before and after exercise.

Authors:  R M Fumich; A E Ellison; G J Guerin; P D Grace
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1981 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the taped ankle before and after exercise.

Authors:  R K Laughman; T A Carr; E Y Chao; J W Youdas; F H Sim
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

  8 in total
  17 in total

Review 1.  The effect of ankle bracing on athletic performance.

Authors:  S D Bot; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Efficacy of Prophylactic Ankle Support: An Experimental Perspective.

Authors:  Mitchell L Cordova; Christopher D Ingersoll; Riann M Palmieri
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Effect of athletic taping and kinesiotaping® on measurements of functional performance in basketball players with chronic inversion ankle sprains.

Authors:  Seda Bicici; Nihan Karatas; Gul Baltaci
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

5.  Taping and semirigid bracing may not affect ankle functional range of motion.

Authors:  T R Lindley; T W Kernozek
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Effects of ankle braces upon agility course performance in high school athletes.

Authors:  M R Beriau; W B Cox; J Manning
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Functional performance following an ice immersion to the lower extremity.

Authors:  K M Cross; R W Wilson; D H Perrin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  A comparison of moleskin tape, linen tape, and lace-up brace on joint restriction and movement performance.

Authors:  R C Metcalfe; G A Schlabach; M A Looney; E J Renehan
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Ankle ranges of motion during extended activity periods while taped and braced.

Authors:  D L Paris; J Kokkaliaris; V Vardaxis
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union.

Authors:  P A Hume; D F Gerrard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.